User talk:Hans fritzlapper

Welcome!
Hello, Hans fritzlapper, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Satanic saucepans, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kiwi128 (talk) 11:24, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Satanic saucepans


A tag has been placed on Satanic saucepans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Kiwi128 (talk) 11:24, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Satanic saucepans


A tag has been placed on Satanic saucepans requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  GILO  A& E&uArr;  22:23, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Notability
First off, epic band name is epic. Good choice!

That aside, the reason the page was deleted was because it was promotional in tone and didn't really show how the band would meet WP:NBAND. Triple J can't be used as a reliable source since it appears that it's a place where anyone can review the music. What you need are reviews from places like Pitchfork, where they have a set staff that reviews the music and they have an editorial oversight. News articles are also good, but I didn't really see any there. Team Rock might be usable, but the band is only briefly named, so it'd be considered a WP:TRIVIAL source. The tone was also an issue, since some of the sentences came across like they came from a press release like this one: "Three piece from the city of churches the Satanic Saucepans have been called "Death n' roll irreverence" for their own blend of death/black/thrash metal and rock influences."

If you want to continue to try to work on an entry, I'd suggest going through WP:AfC since you're a member of the band. This would give you more time to work on an entry and it would also enable you to have a second, uninvolved editor look over the page and give recommendations. Plus since it would go through a review by that second editor, it would help take care of the concerns of a conflict of interest. (WP:COI) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  05:56, 9 September 2015 (UTC)