User talk:Hanuman Das/Archive 1

Neem_Karoli_Baba
Hi Hanuman Das, I understand your reaction, however in the interest of keeping wikipedia factual, I believe that it is important to stick with official names, and not honorifics and assumed names, which can possibly lead to confusion, terms such as "Guruji" which has been used to refer to many spiritual masters on wikipedia. Let us await popular consensus on this matter. Sfacets 13:36, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Sorry!
After fighting spam articles all day I get a bit quick on the trigger finger :P. It would help if you were to include a claim to notability (other than 'was a Sanskrit scholar') from the start in the article. Thanks :) porges 05:23, 27 April 2006 (UTC)

My email
Hanuman, you can email me at chrisott1@cox.net so our discussion can be private.
 * Thanks. I've responded to your query by email... &mdash;Hanuman Das 17:28, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

Want to share some knowledge.......about Hinduism.
Hi Haniman Dasji,I am also interested about the Hinduism and a great lover of Lord Shiva. I want to know your e-mail ID for some informative conversations. I am giving my ID : k6_sharma@yahoo.co.in (Kailash Sharma).

Guru-shishya_tradition
May you have some time to tak a look at Guru-shishya_tradition? I worked on this article a while ago, and I would appreciate some comments about the accuracy of the material and how it may be improved. ≈ jossi ≈ t &bull; @ 20:47, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the idea. I signed both pages with my IP address. Why the hell didn't I think of that? ---Baba Louis 02:13, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

I appreciate the move to draw attention to the problem in order to settle the actual issues regarding content. I will sign both pages also. Thanks for the initiative to try and resolve the problems.--Chai Walla 05:46, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Blocked
I've removed the block William M. Connolley 18:00, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
 * WIlliam M. Connolley beat me to removign this one, it doesn't seem to be 3RR at all -- Tawker 18:52, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Thanks and question
Hello, thanks for looking into my block, even if you were a little too late. What can I do about Admin Bhadani? He seems to have taken sides against me in a content dispute. Shouldn't he refrain from adjudicating issues and let another admin do so if he is involved in editing any of the set of articles involved? He seems to be siding with a user who has a long history of abuses and who I've finally had to open an RfC against, as every other form of mediation has failed. This user simply waits until the mediators are no longer paying attention, and then rewrites or removes the mediated section. He has done this repeatedly. Can you give any advice on these two matters? &mdash;Hanuman Das 19:37, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Ok, I've asked Bhadani not to use any admin powers whatsoever in a dispute that he appears to be conflict of interested in, if that fails, there is always ArbCom and if mediation and RfC's fail, that may be your only course of action. Cheers! -- Tawker 19:46, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Requests for comment/Hamsacharya dan
This RfC has been filed, that is likely your best course to find a resolution to the dispute -- Tawker 21:34, 2 May 2006 (UTC)

Question
Hanuman Das, I have a question. Do you know anything about the Indian "dhuni" ritual? I did the stub for it but don't know if I'm right. The reason I'm asking you is you know a lot about Nath and I found this website: Nath Dhuni Site. I was under the impression that it was Zoroastrian. But Shirdi Sai Baba (Hindu) performed it as well as Meher Baba (Zoroastrian). Have you heard of it? Do you know its roots?

Chris 02:45, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Welcome back
I welcome back you to wikipedia. I also thank you for adding useful information on the Matrikas page. I am sure that we all shall work together and make the Project true a global encyclopedia. Let us forget the skirmish, and continue our march towards creating Better than the Best. Regards. --Bhadani 15:01, 4 May 2006 (UTC)

Poll
Thanks for drawing my attention to the "poll" at Sidhoji Rao Shitole. I voted and logged out to display my IP address once again. I don't think that Dan and Shaninath have any interest in discussing the points raised or the reason why some of us assert that the Yogiraj Gurunath Siddhanath page fails badly in NPOV. This thing drags on. Their interest seems to be purely based on their personal view of the subject. I still do not understand their arguments as they are not based on any reasonable fact. They are promoting a mythology and attempting to have it entered into the Wikipedia as encyclopedic fact. I think the Sidhoji Rao Shitole article is NPOV at the moment, so I support the Keep and redirect. I think Dan is getting more reactive because at some point the admin will be commenting and acting on his RfC. What a mess. Thanks for work to help bring these issues into the light.--Chai Walla 06:43, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

Experiences
Dear Hanuman Das,

have you ever met Mahavatar Babaji? In person, directly? Have you ever come to know Him, by His mercy, intimately?

Nitya

Regarding panchamakara
I am new to wiki and thought I cited my sources by giving the name of the books in which the theory is explained. What more can I do? Thanks cJ --Cracker jack 15:24, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Neem Karoli Baba
Namastte Hanuman Das,

I saw your comments about Neem Karoli Baba. Thank you.

Best, RRani