User talk:Happienall

January 2016
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ethan Cutkosky has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:39, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Ethan Cutkosky was changed by Happienall (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957766 on 2016-01-06T23:39:02+00:00.

Your recent editing history at Dylan O'Brien shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Bbb23 (talk) 05:32, 9 January 2016 (UTC)

Holland Roden
Posting a photograph of a living person who is the subject of an article that makes them look like a zombie, or is otherwise unflattering to them, is a breech of the biographies of living persons policy. Please do not do so again, and note that removing BLP violations is not subject to the WP:3RR rule, while editing to maintain violations is -- that is, if you continue to edit war to keep the picture in the article, you may be blocked from editing in the future, but i can revert you as often as necessary without being blocked. Therefore, this is not an edit war you can possibly "win", but can certainly lose. Please consider this when deciding what your next edit to the article will be. BMK (talk) 01:43, 11 January 2016 (UTC)