User talk:HappyHeartz

Welcome!
Hi HappyHeartz! I noticed your contributions to Education in social work&#32;and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Happy editing! Tacyarg (talk) 22:52, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Words and Pictures in Child Protection (February 23)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Words and Pictures in Child Protection and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Words_and_Pictures_in_Child_Protection Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Drmies&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Words_and_Pictures_in_Child_Protection reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Drmies (talk) 22:48, 23 February 2024 (UTC)


 * This isn't a 'manual', it describes different types of words and pictures. If you follow the references in the article, you'll see there are other approaches with a similar objective and the article carefully illuminates the distinctions within the approach in order to avoid ambiguity. Moreover, the references cite reliable (published, peer-reviewed journal articles) from MSW, PhDs with expertise in the field. According to the referenced materials, this approach used is in a specialized field (child protection) worldwide. The comments regarding why this was rejected do not seem connect to the subject matter and lack any meaningful direction on what disqualifies this from being published.
 * I want to contribute, but the feedback seems disconnected and misplaced.
 * Please advise.
 * Kind Regards. HappyHeartz (talk) 14:57, 21 May 2024 (UTC)