User talk:HappyWheeler4Life

Speedy deletion nomination of Marseilles Mill Ruins


A tag has been placed on Marseilles Mill Ruins requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Calabe1992 01:55, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Calabe1992 02:01, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Just a reminder
Please avoid using abusive edit summaries as per Civility and No personal attacks. Thanks and happy editing. ~ Feedintm Parley 03:00, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Shippingsport Bridge for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Shippingsport Bridge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Shippingsport Bridge until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JoelWhy (talk) 21:38, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Bridge
Sorry, it appears you misread or misunderstood what I wrote. I didn't indicate that the bridge was fake (never even crossed my mind, actually.) I said it didn't appear to be notable. Nothing personal, just didn't seem wiki-worthy. But, keep in mind, I don't make the final decision or anything. Please feel free to add on the Talk page why you feel it should be included. I have no problem with keeping the page if you can show it's notable (there certainly are other, notable bridges w/ Wiki pages.) If it's not just a regular, ol' bridge, please indicate what makes it notable so we can have reason to keep the page.JoelWhy (talk) 01:27, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Gudmund Sonny Jessen Bridge


A tag has been placed on Gudmund Sonny Jessen Bridge requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 03:03, 27 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Sorry, it's not enough to say that you own the site the material is copied from. For one thing, we have no way to be sure that someone on the end of a wire is who he says he is; for another, release to Wikipedia involves much more than just permission to reproduce - in posting to Wikipedia, you are giving permission to any reader to copy, modify and use for any purpose including commercial, and it is essential that the actual copyright owner understands and agrees to this. Therefore the release procedure explained at WP:Donating copyrighted materials (if you own the copyright yourself) or WP:Requesting copyright permission (if someone else does) must be followed. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 07:54, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Copyvios
Most of the text at johnweeks.com is suitable for Wikipedia but if you use it please do the following:
 * at johnweeks.com, change the "all rights reserved" notice to one compatible with the GFDL/CC
 * on Wikipedia, point out that the text is licensed using: a talk page message, an HTML comment (&lt;!--) and an edit summary
 * provide coords !

An edit summary before someone deletes this, i own johnweeks.com, the site of source is utterly pointless. We need proof that you own johnweeks.com. Additionally, do not post totally unreferenced articles and why should we be deprived of your photos - please upload them to the Commons. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:38, 28 March 2012 (UTC)


 * in order to avoid deleting the articles, I have been stubbifying those I have seen. The previous versions remain in the edit history, and can be restored when you have satisfied the copyright requirements. (anything deleted can be restored when you have theccopyright straightened out--ask RHaworth or John or me).  RHaworth's advice is exactly what you ought to do; it is by far the easiest way to deal with the situation.  Please note that when he said, "most of the text", that means including information about the bridges, not the opinion about the dubious plans of CSX and similar polemical comments--it will be easier for you to remove them than for others. (material on the general history of the railroads concerned should be added to their own articles) And since you have undoubtedly sources for all the material on your site, please do add them to the articles, just as he advised. Your site has only your own authority, and we need something beyond that that is published.   JohnCD has given you the same advice as RHaworth and I have.

The material you have is excellent--it will help the users of the encyclopedia and deserves wide distribution. Please do not compromise it.  DGG ( talk ) 18:14, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Utica Bridge
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Utica Bridge, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.johnweeks.com/river_illinois/pages/illC05.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Utica Bridge and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Utica Bridge, in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Utica Bridge with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Utica Bridge. See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Utica Bridge saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! • Gene93k (talk) 19:57, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Veterans Memorial Bridge (Ottawa, Illinois)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Veterans Memorial Bridge (Ottawa, Illinois), but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.johnweeks.com/river_illinois/pages/illC07.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Veterans Memorial Bridge (Ottawa, Illinois) and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Veterans Memorial Bridge (Ottawa, Illinois), in your email. See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Veterans Memorial Bridge (Ottawa, Illinois) with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Veterans Memorial Bridge (Ottawa, Illinois). See Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at [ this temporary page]. Leave a note at Talk:Veterans Memorial Bridge (Ottawa, Illinois) saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! • Gene93k (talk) 20:13, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Copyright problem: Abraham Lincoln Memorial Bridge
Your addition to Abraham Lincoln Memorial Bridge has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

The text you added was copied from http://www.johnweeks.com/river_illinois/pages/illC04.html where copyright is clearly stated. • Gene93k (talk) 23:05, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

Pages copied from johnweeks.com
The following pages copied from johnweeks.com have been tagged for copyright investigation:
 * Scott Wike Lucas Bridge copied from http://www.johnweeks.com/river_illinois/pages/illA09.html
 * Ottawa Rail Bridge copied from from http://www.johnweeks.com/river_illinois/pages/illC06.html
 * LaSalle Rail Bridge copied from http://www.johnweeks.com/river_illinois/pages/illC03.html
 * Marseilles Bridge copied from http://www.johnweeks.com/river_illinois/pages/illC08.html

Although you say you own the site, Wikipedia needs proof of permission to use the text. You can send an e-mail from johnweeks.com to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org giving Wikipedia permission to use the text. Otherwise the copied text will have to be removed. • Gene93k (talk) 01:06, 1 April 2012 (UTC)

Update regarding copyright concern
Since we do not yet have verification of permission by the processes set out above and sufficient time has passed since the placement of the notice, the content has been deleted for copyright concerns. This deletion is not necessarily permanent. If you have already sent a letter to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) and GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (if you are not the copyright holder or have co-authored the material, release under CC-BY-SA-compatible license alone is sufficient), the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed by the Wikimedia Communications committee. Likewise, if you have not yet sent a letter, you still may (or resend it, if you believe your original may have been lost), and the article will be restored when that letter is received and processed.

As Wikipedia does not require proof of identity on account creation, it is essential that we receive external proof of authorization in order to ensure that we remain compliant with US Copyright law. It is also essential that we verify that copyright holders understand the extent of the release they are authorizing, in that our licenses permit modification and reuse in any forum, even commercial publication, as long as authorship credit is maintained and future copies are compatibly licensed.

Please note that once permission is verified, the material may be evaluated and altered to meet Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Although we appreciate donations, we cannot guarantee that material donated will be retained.

Thank you. Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:57, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Please fill out our brief Teahouse guest survey
Hello fellow Wikipedian, the hardworking hosts and staff at WP:Teahouse would like your feedback! We have created a brief survey meant to help us better understand the experience of new editors on Wikipedia. You are being selected to participate in our survey because you edited the Teahouse Questions or Guests pages sometime in the last few months.

Click here to be taken to the survey site.

The survey should take less than 10 minutes to complete. We really appreciate your feedback, and we look forward to your next vist to the Teahouse!

Happy editing,

J-Mo, Teahouse host

This message was sent via Global message delivery on 00:31, 22 May 2012 (UTC)