User talk:HappyandGrumpy

Speedy deletion of Diablog
A tag has been placed on Diablog, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. — Matt Eason (Talk &#149; Contribs) 00:55, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

FYI Conflict of interest guideline
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam); and,
 * 4) avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. — Athaenara ✉  01:10, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Diablog
I have nominated Diablog, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Diablog. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:03, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Please Participate in the AfD
Thanks for editing Wikipedia. As I'm sure you're aware your article is up for deletion. If you wish to contest you need to show that it is notable. In order to save the article you must argue the case on the AfD. Reading and participating in this debate will help you in understanding the criteria and help you create better articles in the future. Thank you. Happy editing--Beligaronia (talk) 19:00, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD
Thank you for commenting. It is usual to keep debates in chronological order earliest at the top. PLease remember to sign your posts. Please read Sock puppetry as it would seem that the account User:Human Touch was created solely for the purpose of voting in the AfD. AfD is not an election and therefore the final decision is based on arguments used. Thanks for your involvement.--Beligaronia (talk) 02:08, 20 November 2008 (UTC)