User talk:Happyhare

29 April 2010
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to KYE Systems Corp., without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Sprocket (talk) 07:27, 29 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I have posted some facts and have been deleted. Didn't receive any explanation for that. Please explain thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Happyhare (talk • contribs)


 * Hi -- I gave my rationale for removal in the edit summary. I felt that your edits, coming from a single-edit user in China, did not have an NPOV intent and that it was misleading to say that the "Chinese government" had "cleared" the allegations when in actual fact it was a city-level department that had only responded to a few different aspects of the report. I have edited your contribution to an NPOV but left the essentials of it intact. Sprocket (talk) 06:20, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

I am interpreting the news NPOV. I agree with you that "cleared" may not be the correct word. However a City-level department, I believe, is Chinese government. Unless a City-level department is considered a private institution. As long as it is a public institution and its function is to regulate labor issues then I would say that it is Governmental. Please remember that China has a totally different political structure than most of the western world. I agree with your last changes. After all who is interested in this controversy can read the references. Thank you.