User talk:Happysailor/Archive 11

Noah Kellogg - Criteria for speedy deletion
I have responded to the notice. Notice that AlkiHistoryProject is the author of the Noah Kellogg article and the source of the original material. AlkiHistoryProject gives permission for use of the material as submitted to wikipedia. We are one and the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alkihistoryproject (talk • contribs) 22:59, 3 March 2017 (UTC)

Noah Kellogg
I have much reduced the bulk of the wikipedia article. I hope this passes muster now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alkihistoryproject (talk • contribs) 06:38, 4 March 2017 (UTC)


 * While the article was deleted, the contents have now been moved to Draft:Noah Kellogg for you to work on. - Happysailor  (Talk) 14:45, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

My Page
Hi. I'm not sure how the entry is promotional as it doesn't link to any businesses? I work with a lot of therapists and wanted more people to be3 able to find out about it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Clarec2002 (talk • contribs) 14:58, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * While it didn't link to any particular business, it was still written in a promotional style which is unencyclopedic. If the subject matter in question is notable anough to have an entry, it must be written in a neutral style and referenced accordingly - Happysailor  (Talk) 20:05, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

Duplicate/Copy Draft: Sunrisers Hyderabad in 2017
The article(Draft:Sunrisers Hyderabad in 2017) request is original, and one of the user create that as he copy this page request. The request to create the page rise on 18:11, 20 February 2017‎, and the user create the copy (Sunrisers Hyderabad in 2017) of this request and create on 09:49, 1 March 2017‎. That thing to copy a page request is not good...

Please check the history and say the Draft is duplicate or original. Actually Draft is original. See history of the both articles. The user copy the draft and create that as new article, 117.246.170.208 (talk) 18:26, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 * If you took a look at the mainspace version, you will see that I have tagged it for a history merge with the original draft. that will align the subject history correctly - Happysailor  (Talk) 20:03, 5 March 2017 (UTC)


 * hello dude, Thank you very much, my request Draft declined but Creating of that page is fine right now. 117.209.215.92 (talk) 09:52, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:London School of Samba

Thanks again for your comments.

It would help if you gave me a specific point that needs a reference.

None of my questions have been specifically answered:

- the godmother of the LSS in Brazil Mocidade Independente de Padre Miguel has a wikipedia page but you will not allow the LSS to have one.

- how can you be allowing wikipedia pages for samba schools in Brazil but NOT in the UK?

- that the LSS is the first samba group in the UK is byound dispute - I have provided citations from a variety of reputable sources (1984-1987) but NONE are online.

- the previous reviewer would not accept a page from flickr, depicting an newspaper article, and credited in copyright to the original publisher.

The text is very short. What is the specific point that needs a reference. If it more than more thing that needs verification please point this out what is the additional point that needs verification.

Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mags Samba (talk • contribs) 17:40, 6 March 2017 (UTC)

仔猫をどうぞ！
Plasa Cat

Nitta12n (talk) 20:56, 6 March 2017 (UTC) 

Thankou
Thanyou this time. Our officers have founded I'm sure your right can nYou was full of sense of Justice. Goo by.21:01, 6 March 2017 (UTC)Nitta12n (talk)

Shin Hoseok
Hi, Shin Hoseok is a Kpop Idol who goes by the Name of Wonho who is from Monsta X but it doesnt let me create a new page named Wonho, only Shin Hoseok — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jadeoliviaax (talk • contribs) 19:24, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Hello! Why you want to delete article of FixThePhoto.com?
This page should not be speedily deleted because it does not serve only to promote the services. It is made for people to know the information about this company's founders, achievements, etc. Hope, you will publish this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Antipocka (talk • contribs) 21:28, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
 * It's spam. Please read the links you've been given.86.20.193.222 (talk) 22:27, 8 March 2017 (UTC)

Zebrafish
I apologize for the edits I had made. I was doing research on the Zebrafish, and I left my computer unattended (except to a few naughty friends). My friends later told me that they had did this, but I could not figure out how to change the Wikipedia article on Zebrafish back to before the unnecessary edits were made. Again, I apologize, and thank you for changing the article back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.88.234.181 (talk) 01:59, 9 March 2017 (UTC)

Re-considering The approval of Gautal Kalal
hi, Guatal Kalal is a well renowed Digital Expert, and has contributed high;y to start-ups in india. he is indigineous and repuatable and the content written about him has no promotional or advesrtsing side, and he is one of the major contributors to "Digital India". i plan or re-creating the page on wikipedia and i want the page should be given a chance because it deserves a chance, any advise or moodificatio that will make the content/ page stay should be considered. your advise is welcome.Imaginemiah (talk) 06:39, 11 March 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Demonym for Argentina
Hola Happysailor,

Hope you can help me with the distinction between "essay" vs "article" style, I thought I understood but now I'm fuzzy about how to correct the proposed article so that its published.

For example, saying that the demonym that is officially used by the government of Argentina is Argentine (not Argentinian/Argentinean) and provide links to official government websites that show this usage. Why is that considered an essay style?

Another example, the part about Argentine being the grammatically correct usage ... How can I correct that part? Is correcting a demonym always an opinion/essay?

The part about how much each alternative demonym is used is that OK? how about the link to the Google data?

Sorry about the barrage of questions, but I'm trying to understand. And I very much appreciate your time and help to get this right!

Jose Fernandez-Calvo (talk) 01:32, 13 March 2017 (UTC)

Please help me
I am new and need help.. Can you please add the category to LGBT Male Actor, Nickelodeon there will probably be more soon as I am trying to get it added.

01:04, 15 March 2017 (UTC)ConquerYourPc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Conqueryourpc (talk • contribs)

Articles Unreasonably Deleted
There was a reason why the articles Matt Works, Jim Burt (american YouTuber), and BillyB123 were there. You deleted them for no reason, but, you could have fixed the info boxes. User talk:M briglia05 17:04 19 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I suggest you 1) Look at the reason those articles were deleted, 2) look at who actually deleted them (as it wasn't me) and 3) Learn the rules & guidelines for article creation so that you can create articles that benefit the project. Lastly - the infoxoes were't the reason the articles were deleted. - Happysailor  (Talk) 21:09, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Cousin louis
My apologies Happysailor I thought by creating an account on Wikipedia you are also allowed to give a brief mention or description about yourself rather. It wasn't vandalism to any article or any source. I'm still new to Wikipedia and I will continue to make mistakes. However when you contested on the deletion o Cousin Louis did you mean deletion of my Wikipedia account or my article? It better not be my account. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cousin louis (talk • contribs) 19:21, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
 * No, your account is fine, just the article was deleted. - Happysailor  (Talk) 21:10, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Changes to Mi krop
I have never seen this page before, neither have I ever attempted changes to it! Sorry. Not sure why you sent me a message. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.28.23.7 (talk) 18:18, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
 * You are an IP - the message was for who previously used the IP address - Happysailor  (Talk) 21:12, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Joanne Jackson (talk) 01:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC) Joanne Jackson - lead producer of The Messenger documentary trying to change wiki page
Joanne Jackson (talk) 01:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC) Hi There, I tried to correct some inaccuracies and update the Wikipedia page for our documentary film The Messenger,but my changes were not accepted. www.theMessengerDoc.com I have never made changes on Wikipedia before, so I am looking for guidance and support. Our company SongbirdSOS Productions Inc. has the copyright to this film with our French co-production partners Films a Cinq. I do not know who set up the Wiki page initially.. Since the film had its world premiere at Hot Docs in Toronto, Ontario, Canada in 2015, it has played in many places, and won awards... so  we'd just like the wiki page to be updated to reflect this. Can you help me? (I am based just outside Toronto, Canada) You can view my profile and see all the info about the film, and our company on our website www.theMessengerDoc.com. My bio is on this page..http://songbirdsos.com/about/the-producers/ Links for media coverage/interviews etc. for the film is on our press page.. http://songbirdsos.com/press-room/press-coverage/

Thanks for your consideration and your work to keep Wikipedia correct with its facts. Best wishes, Joanne Jackson, Producer, THE MESSENGER SongbirdSOS Productions Inc., Ajax, Ontario, Canada Direct Phone: +1 -416-801-1118 joanne@songbirdsos.com, Now playing in select cinemas. www.theMessengerDoc.com Request a screening. http://songbirdsos.com/screenings/book-a-screening-canada-international/ In the USA: https://www.kinolorberedu.com/film/themessenger

Duland Speedy deletion
Hi Happysailor, I only had Duland up for 5 minutes and I got a Speedy deletion on it. Please, I am going to edit it so if you could give me more time it would be great so please take the speedy deletion off.

Thanks a lot!

Joseph095 (talk) 18:38, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4
Hello ,

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just reviews, the  backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.
 * Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Page Curation/Suggested improvements
 * The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:
 * User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js adds a link to the new pages feed and page curation toolbar to your top toolbar on Wikipedia
 * User:The Earwig/copyvios.js adds a link in your side toolbox that will run the current page through

General project update:
 * Following discussion at Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers, New pages patrol/Noticeboard has been marked as historical. Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers is currently the most active central discussion forum for the New Page Patrol project. To keep up to date on the most recent discussions you can add it to your watchlist or visit it periodically.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Yuri Gurski


A tag has been placed on Yuri Gurski, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Edwardx (talk) 10:33, 17 August 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:33, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 16,991 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
 * has created a NPP browser in WMF Labs that allows you to search new unreviewed pages using keywords and categories.
 * The Wikimedia Foundation Community Tech team is working with the community to implement the autoconfirmed article creation trial. The trial is currently set to start on 7 September 2017, pending final approval of the technical features.
 * Please remember to focus on the quality of review: correct tagging of articles and not tagbombing are important. Searching for potential copyright violations is also important, and it can be aided by Earwig's Copyvio Detector, which can be added to your toolbar for ease of use with this user script.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:16, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 14304 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
 * Currently there are 532 pages in the backlog that were created by non-autoconfirmed users before WP:ACTRIAL. The NPP project is undertaking a drive to clear these pages from the backlog before they hit the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing a few today!
 * The Wikimedia Foundation is currently working on creating a new filter for page curation that will allow new page patrollers to filter by extended confirmed status. For more information see: 
 * On 14 September 2017 the English Wikipedia began the autoconfirmed article creation trial. For a six month period, creation of articles in the mainspace of the English Wikipedia will be restricted to users with autoconfirmed status. New users who attempt article creation will now be redirected to a newly designed landing page.
 * Before clicking on a reference or external link while reviewing a page, please be careful that the site looks trustworthy. If you have a question about the safety of clicking on a link, it is better not to click on it.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

Merger discussion for Patricia Daničić
An article that you have been involved in editing&mdash;Patricia Daničić&mdash;has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please follow the (Discuss) link at the top of the article to participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Osplace 01:49, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
 * The article was a duplicate, with nothing to merge, so changed the newer article with only 1 ref into a redirect into the older article. - Happysailor  (Talk) 20:28, 1 October 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Technology update: General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 17:47, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * The new page backlog is currently at 12,878 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a day.
 * We have successfully cleared the backlog of pages created by non-confirmed accounts before ACTRIAL. Thank you to everyone who participated in that drive.
 * Primefac has created a script that will assist in requesting revision deletion for copyright violations that are often found in new pages. For more information see User:Primefac/revdel.
 * The Article Wizard has been updated and simplified to match the layout style of the new user landing page. If you have not yet seen it, take a look.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: Outreach and Invitations:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
 * Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!
 * If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: . Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive
 * A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
 * Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. —  TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC) 
 * ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
 * The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
 * To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

New Years new page backlog drive
Hello, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:


 * The total number of reviews completed for the month.
 * The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. — TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter
Hello, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!

Backlog update: New Year Backlog Drive results:
 * The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
 * We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!
 * We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update: If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)
 * ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
 * Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

02:21:13, 15 March 2018 review of submission by Abdalla Dabdoub
Abdalla Dabdoub (talk) 02:21, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Thank you very much for the reviewing, I took your remarks into consideration please have a look: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Joseph_Zyss , and resubmitted the article to be reviewed again since there is already an article in French wikipedia about the same person https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Zyss, thanks alot


 * Great - the draft is back in the queue and will be reviewed as soon as it can. @- Happysailor  (Talk) 14:16, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

14:17:24, 15 March 2018 review of submission by Memo2007Ultra-wkpd
Our page has been declined, we need you to state which part of the page needs adjustments and we need suggestions from you, too much abstract information might cause misunderstanding. please note that the page is not for advertisement, a press, commercial usage.

Memo2007Ultra-wkpd (talk) 14:17, 15 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Your draft is written in an unencyclopedic, it's more like a list, and is also written in an promotional tone (hell the first four lines arae like an advertisement). Also you have not provided any references that show that the subject of your page is notable.


 * Please note that all articles need to show notability (See WP:NOTE), and be verified by significant and reliable third party references (See WP:SOURCE) which should be included by using inline citations (See WP:REFB) - Happysailor  (Talk) 14:19, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Arca edits
I expanded the Arca Foundation to include more information about them and their efforts. The page was last updated years ago. I removed duplicate or out-of-date information. Happy to include a note in the "talk" section to say so if you can restore my edits.

Expat Teacher (talk) 14:43, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

Your AIV report
Hi, please do not remove reports and comments on AIV if you plan on reporting the user again without explanation. I agree with 's assessment: this is clear-cut not vandalism and cannot be dealt with there. -- Luk  talk 14:07, 15 March 2018 (UTC)


 * huh? i think you're confused... (because I am) - Happysailor  (Talk) 14:14, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I think this was an oops. Looks like Luk may have misread your edit and thought you were deleting my decline of another report. -Ad Orientem (talk) 15:00, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Oops indeed, sorry about that, I was trying to do two things at once and now I'm confused too... -- Luk  talk 15:09, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
 * No worries, as long as we're all confused together... -  Happysailor  (Talk) 15:16, 15 March 2018 (UTC)

13:27:59, 16 March 2018 review of submission by RealCGG
Hey, can I get some help on how to get this page published? Like what specifically do I need to add or cite in order to make it eligible. Thanks! RealCGG (talk) 13:27, 16 March 2018 (UTC)


 * The comment I left on this, and the other pages you have drafted explains exactly what you need to do.


 * All articles need to show notability (See WP:NOTE), and be verified by significant and reliable third party references (See WP:SOURCE) which should be included by using inline citations (See WP:REFB)


 * Therefore, you need to add references. The current ones do not cut it. - Happysailor  (Talk) 13:29, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

Re-reviewing the draft Joseph ZYSS
Hello, I reviewed your remarks : - I added inline citation. - I added some links to show the notability, Beside the prizes the person has been awarded, also the existance of French wikipedia article about the person could show some notability at least in francophone world. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Joseph_Zyss — Preceding unsigned comment added by Abdalla Dabdoub (talk • contribs) 16:29, 16 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Your draft is now back in the queue, and will be reviewed as soon as possible. As a note, please don't remove previous declines or comments from drafts. - Happysailor  (Talk) 17:37, 16 March 2018 (UTC)

== paddy killoran the source for my addition to paddy's wikipedia page was me. he was my cousin and paddy noonan told me they were partners back in the 90's. my cousin passed in the late 60's i was a teenager Billyk250 (talk) 18:14, 17 March 2018 (UTC) ==

paddy killoran the source for my addition to paddy's wikipedia page was me. he was my cousin (my grandfather michael killoran's 1st cousin and paddy noonan told me they were partners back in the 90's . my cousin passed in the late 60's i was a teenager Billyk250 (talk) 18:14, 17 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, articles cannot contain original research. - Happysailor  (Talk) 22:48, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

reason for debate
Reason for debate Happypretty1 (talk) 22:44, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Please note that all articles need to show notability (See WP:NOTE), and be verified by significant and reliable third party references (See WP:SOURCE) which should be included by using inline citations (See WP:REFB) - Happysailor  (Talk) 22:48, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Sorry
Ok, I am sorry. Is there anything I can do to help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by UserPerson1210 (talk • contribs) 00:12, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for the review
Thanks for your comments. Yes, most of my sources were the British Transplant Society's own website. I've tried to find other sources to support the article. I've resubmitted. Let me know what you think.

Ben — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benedictphillips01 (talk • contribs) 13:30, 18 March 2018 (UTC)


 * If you have resumitted it - it will be reviewed shortly. - Happysailor  (Talk) 00:40, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Question
I have a question. Could you help? — Preceding unsigned comment added by UserPerson1210 (talk • contribs) 00:38, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Yes? - Happysailor  (Talk) 00:40, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Why should I not write about what I think about sauerkraut? — Preceding unsigned comment added by UserPerson1210 (talk • contribs) 00:52, 19 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Because that is not the point of Wikipedia. Please read WP:Editing policy - Happysailor  (Talk) 00:54, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

So no opinions,just facts? — Preceding unsigned comment added by UserPerson1210 (talk • contribs) 00:59, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

09:07:24, 19 March 2018 review of submission by Christopherljohnson
Thank you but I believe the submission rises to this standard. Please see a parallel academic journal's approved and published Wikipedia page here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Journal_of_Lesbian_Studies. It contains a statement of purpose and other facts of publication but no direct references to anything. The Journal of Cyber Security and Conflict is at least as well established.

Christopherljohnson (talk) 09:07, 19 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Thank you for pointing out that article. I have tagged it as unreferenced for now. - Happysailor  (Talk) 13:12, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

Why are you stopping my vandalism?
Why do you waste your time deleting my work. Mad annoying — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamessulldogdafrog (talk • contribs) 13:26, 19 March 2018 (UTC)
 * If you didn't vandalise the article, you wouldn't have been reverted. - Happysailor  (Talk) 13:27, 19 March 2018 (UTC)

AMCA
AMCA is a company based in Toronto — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2607:FEA8:3BE0:112:31BD:42FA:9541:C38F (talk) 13:19, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Really, are you sure? - Happysailor  (Talk) 17:42, 28 March 2018 (UTC)

New Page Review Newsletter No.10
Hello, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages! ACTRIAL:
 * ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing
 * Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines
 * The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
 * Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies. A further discussion is currently taking  place at: Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline?

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled
 * While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)
 * The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.