User talk:Happysailor/Archive 9

Jose Baselga page
Hello-

I received your message and I guess because I am new to doing this I really do not understand what you mean. I thought I could just follow formatting from other pages and update Jose Baselga's page as I go along. However, if there is someone or somewhere else where I could provide the information and it be updated on the page that would be great. Is this what you are saying? with all the media and language on the pages its very hard to decipher what is going on. Ultimately, I need the page to be updated with basic information and a photo. I have all the information and I don't know where the "talk page" or watch page" is. It's really a lot and I thought I finally found a method to do what was asked of me and it seems now I cant do just that. The pages are extremely busy and i'm really struggling with this. Where should be making the edits?

Please help,

CandiceTHOPP — Preceding unsigned comment added by CandiceTHOPP (talk • contribs) 16:14, 20 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Improvements to existing articles should be made on the article itself, and not by creating a new page (or draft) which is then submitted. If you don't want to edit the encyclopedia directly, you can make suggestions onthe relevant article talk page. However, if you want to write out what you want to edit with prior to making the eidt, you can use your own sandbox for this (see the link in the top right menu) - Happysailor  (Talk) 16:22, 26 July 2015 (UTC)

Akshardham Delhi Environmental Violations
Hello,

If you have time would you please take a look at this article: and this discussion  and provide your input. I feel you can help with some clarification for this topic.

Thank you

Swamiblue (talk) 03:25, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Angeles Band
I am having trouble understanding the format and content of what should go into an article I have put factual content in my article but it keeps getting bumped out. I want to write this article but I am now very frustrated I have read up on different things but everything seems so complicated like how to add your talk page to my watchlist I don't know how to do that even.Dale Lytle (talk) 23:29, 28 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Your draft was declined because your band does not currently pass the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics.
 * If you feel that the band is notable, and passes the music notability guidelines at WP:MUSIC, then please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
 * All references should be secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject. This does not include primary sources such as the bands own website/social media/blog etc. - Happysailor  (Talk) 15:15, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

reason for declining
Hi Happy Sailor,

Would like to know why this article was declined? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sangte_Aika

Rajneeshs (talk) 04:16, 3 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Have a look at your draft, and read the text in the grey box (inside the top red one), and also my comment directly below the red boxes. That will explain everything. - Happysailor  (Talk) 09:12, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Kolkata Tram redirection issue.
Hi, I just wanted you to know that I made a mistake when I submitted a redirection request for the new Kolkata Tram being a redirection page for Kolkata tram as at the point, I did not understand the idea of redirecting pages. I have corrected my error by making Kolkata tram a redirection for Kolkata Tram which I intended to do in the first place to capitalize the title. I hope you will accept the changes I have made. Broman178 (talk) 09:42, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

????
Hey {[User:Happysailor]]

You literally gave me no reason for un-reviewing that poor, poor article. I will be tagging it...again... because it's either that or PROD. Next time please learn to give me a reason before out of nowhere reversing my perfectly good work.

Good day mate, --Luis Santos24 (talk) 16:43, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Mother of god in heaven
I'm so sorry, i thought you meant you took away my tags.

so sorry --Luis Santos24 (talk) 16:45, 4 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The tags that you slapped on that article, were haphazard at best. How can an article about a company be a biography about a living person? A company can't be a living person. If you are looking at doing WP:New Page Patrol, I suggest you take another look at some of our guidelines about the use of tags, and also what should/shouldn't be an article. This one is an easy WP:A7 nom for deletion. - Happysailor  (Talk) 16:51, 4 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Ray Pollard
No point in bothering with Wikipedia. Your application of standards is totally arbitrary; no thought put into your decisions to exclude obviously notable articles outside your area of expertise. 67.171.28.206 (talk) 05:35, 9 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I suggest you read the guidelines for musican performers at WP:MUSICBIO. At present, the article does not show Ray Pollard's notability as you haven't proven that he meets one of the criteria at WP:MUSICBIO. - Happysailor  (Talk) 10:10, 9 August 2015 (UTC)

Solvo Submission declined on 10 August 2015
Hello Happysailor,

Could you please explain why my article was declined. It is been declined second time due to same reason. I have added the reference to a professional journal (Energy Procedia by Elsevier), with an article where Solvo simulator was used for evaluation.

Can it be served as a an good reference to make the subject notable or shall I find more references?

Best Regards, Anton — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anton Alexandrov tyulen112 (talk • contribs) 11:15, 10 August 2015 (UTC)


 * First, please stop using ™ symbols on Wikipedia. We don't use them except for a special set of circumstances.
 * Secondly, your article has been declined due to lack of notability. You must provide us with multiple references that prove that it passes the General notability guidelines which state that all articles must have significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. This means that, no, your one reference does not make the subject notable. Please take your time and see what references you can find/use to prove the notability of Solvo - there's no rush.
 * Be aware that not everything is notable, and it may turn out that your article isn't notable enough to be on Wikipedia at present. - Happysailor'  (Talk) 11:25, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Los Ficos
Why was I not approved? Is it because i stated that i was a famous artist first producer? Do you need me to include authentic picture of me and the famous artist working together. I can do that. I was his producer for 5 years — Preceding unsigned comment added by LosFicos (talk • contribs) 20:09, 12 August 2015 (UTC)


 * I suggest you read the message inside the grey box (inside the red one). You have failed to provide ANY sources whatsoever. Wikipedia relies upon verifiability, not truth. You need to provide sources to prove notability. See WP:42 - Happysailor  (Talk) 03:55, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

03:20:55, 14 August 2015 review of submission by Sbspargo
What more do you need... I have supplied what I think that you need

Sbspargo (talk) 03:20, 14 August 2015 (UTC)


 * You have failed to show that the show is notable. You have to show that it has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. See WP:L2. - Happysailor  (Talk) 03:57, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks
Thanks for the brand-spanking new redirects. Now I can finally throw them out of my waiting room. ;) 85.178.214.207 (talk) 23:09, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

would like to understand for declination of our school information
Hello HappySailor , Greetings !

we have added our school information on wikipedia and published today, Our Wiki draft Page is : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:International_School_Of_East_India since i am new to writing article on wikipedia so ready all instruction and followed, after rejection i also noticed lots of section (containing several information about school) was deleted.

I had also added lots of reference for our affiliation board, for our school website , for our location etc.

I am still confused to know what i missed, a reason for rejection and why our few section was deleted ?

Please guide me so that we can put our school information on wiki.

Thanks Chandan — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chandansqlexpert (talk • contribs) 12:30, 15 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Your aricle has been declined because it lacked valid sources, and thus could not show notability. The sources you had added were not valid and so were removed. Promotional text was found in the draft, and so it was removed, along with generic text which does not belong in an encyclopedia article.


 * It is doubtful that your school is notable, and so will not be appearing on Wikipedia. If however, you can find the school has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, then you need to show this in the article. DO NOT attempt to make the article live yourself - it will only be deleted. - Happysailor  (Talk) 15:46, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

Wilhelm Schneider
hope to have fixed the issues - are there different requirements for notability in the German and in the English Wikipedia? In Germany it is sufficient to prove that the person is a professor at an university. (which I tried to ;-)) Hope that the publications (from the universities website) help 89.0.23.175 (talk) 15:09, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * yes, there are different requirements for notability on different language wikipedias. For en.wikipedia, you can see the notability guidelines at WP:NACADEMICS - Happysailor  (Talk) 15:20, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Ok: than I would opt for: "Criterion 4 may be satisfied, for example, if the person has authored several books that are widely used as textbooks (or as a basis for a course) at multiple institutions of higher education." - That is difficult to prove - but you can try (for example) for a distribution of one of his textbooks in universities libraries in Germany: please try: www.kvk.de with the ISBN: 978-3-95404-828-1. (It is not possible to copy the link).

5. Criterion 5 can be applied reliably only for persons who are tenured at the full professor level, and not for junior faculty members with endowed appointments. Difficult to prove - but the universities website should do: http://www.wir.h-brs.de/Personen/ProfessorInnen/Schneider.html. He obiously is a professor and a faculty member ("Professorinnen und Professoren des Fachbereichs")89.0.23.175 (talk) 15:54, 17 August 2015 (UTC)


 * It's not here that you need to prove it. You need to use reliable third party references to show his notability in the article/draft. Use the guidelines as a references to guide you in the right direction for showing his notability. - Happysailor  (Talk) 15:57, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your patience - I hope, I did by now :-) 89.0.23.175 (talk) 16:22, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the edit of the draft
Sorry about mistakenly adding the mainspace links. Alphabett (talk) 16:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)alphabett
 * No worries - it happens. They'll be re-'activated' if it gets approved and moved to mainspace. -  Happysailor  (Talk) 17:41, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

New Page - rejected
Hi HappySailor, I submitted about a week ago the page of "Itzchak Weismann" for review. it was declined on the basis of 'reliable sources'. i don't really understand what that means. it is a biography-type page. where should i place the citations needed? thanks, zivorenst — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zivorenst (talk • contribs) 10:21, 18 August 2015 (UTC)


 * It means that he may well be notable, but you haven't added any sources so we can't tell. You need to show he has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. take a look at Referencing for beginners and Citing sources for any help in how to do this. - Happysailor  (Talk) 17:43, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

HELP - Creating Userpage
Hello Happy Sailor,

I am new to Wikipedia so I ask to be excused in advance. I submitted an description of who I am using the sandbox. I thought that was the proper way so that my user page can be made (reviewed to make sure that I don't "vandalise" Wikipedia. I understand why it was rejected (No referencing at all).

Can you please let me know how I can properly create my userpage so I can also contribute? Additionally, on your talk page, it said I should use my talk page to communicate with you, but I cannot find a field where I can direct the message to you. It only has the field where I can type the message then submit; but I don't know to whom it will go.

Like I said, I just created an account now, and would love to learn more on how to contribute to Wikipedia.

Thank you.

OrosOros.Kaptain (talk) 18:49, 17 August 2015 (UTC)Oros


 * You submitted your sandbox to Articles for Creation. This is for people who are trying to create mainspace articles, not pages in their userspace. If you just want to create your userpage, you can edit it directly. - Happysailor  (Talk) 17:45, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

AfC reviews
You and I are going to have to coordinate our review times or something; we've edit conflicted with each other about ten times over the past half hour... Primefac (talk) 19:17, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * lol, tep, I noticed a couple of submissions that had strangely been reviewed by the time I hit the button -  Happysailor  (Talk) 10:09, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

20:39:15, 23 August 2015 review of submission by Morganmann2012
Hi.

I just wanted to know why my submission was declined again. I made sure to include journal articles as sources. What else do I need to do to get my submission approved?

Thank you.

Morganmann2012 (talk) 20:39, 23 August 2015 (UTC)


 * huh? Your article has only been declined once, and that was for lack of reliable sources. Since then you have added some sources, but haven't resubmitted it. - Happysailor  (Talk) 00:14, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Rejected PhotoZone Magazine page
Hi HappySailor, i hope my email find you happy.

please, i need your help in finalizing the submission of PhotoZone Magazine page on Wikipedia and how can we improve the quality of the content for the readers who are interested in PhotoZone.

Thank you.

page link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:PhotoZone_Magazine — Preceding unsigned comment added by 197.33.0.83 (talk) 12:04, 23 August 2015 (UTC)


 * You are failing to show why the subject is notable, and you are failing to provide sources to verify those claims. (See WP:42). Reddit etc are not reliable sources. - Happysailor  (Talk) 00:16, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Pending article by nimrainayat6290
Dear, actually i dont know how to create articles. Programming of pages is also very difficult for me... :( i will br grateful f you help me... :) Nimrainayat6290 (talk) 14:19, 22 August 2015 (UTC)


 * take a look at WP:FIRST. This will help you on your way. - Happysailor  (Talk) 00:17, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

The Judge Edmund F. Brennan Deletion

 * Friend. Good evening. And thanks for the opportunity to chat with you for just a moment. Quick question. Would it be acceptable then for me to put the information that I have about Judge Brennan on the Talk Page for Operation Broken Trust? If it would, kindly let me know. Because I would very much like to include that information as a talk IF I can't make a page. It is rather important since this man was a key federal judge in deciding this case as it pertains to Northern California. Additionally. I have a personal connection to this operation/investigation because my wife was heavily involved in the matter. Thank you. And look forward to your thoughts. (Forthe1789usconstitution (talk) 01:03, 21 August 2015 (UTC))


 * Your submission looks like you're trying to start a discussion. This is something Wikipedia is NOT for. We are here to create an encyclopedia of articles. See WP:NOT. If you want to start an article, take a look at WP:FIRST - Happysailor  (Talk) 00:19, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

NBRC
Hi, New to Wikipedia and got our draft sent back because of insufficient references. Have added some web and news article but draft was rejected. Unsure of how to proceed. Thanks for you help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nbrcfederalcochair (talk • contribs) 00:37, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Try and find some reliable references that show the subject is notable (See WP:GNG). If the subject is notable, then you just need to show it - Happysailor  (Talk) 00:21, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Request on 15:05:19, 24 August 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by JSethu
Dear Happysailor, Not sure why this article being rejected. This is copy right material from our Public Relations department and same article in Indonesia wikipedia got approved. I cited the same here to. This does not have violation of copy right material. Please give more insight about why this page is being rejected.

JSethu (talk) 15:05, 24 August 2015 (UTC)


 * You have failed to show his notability. You must provide references to show he has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.
 * Other Wikipedias have different inclusion requirements to the English Wikipedia. Inclusion in one, does not automatically mean they will be included here. You MUST show references. The draft won't be accepted in it's present state. I'm not sure why you think this is about copyrighted material, but if the text comes from a copyrighted sources, and it hasn't been released via WP:OTRS, it could be deleted. - Happysailor  (Talk) 17:56, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Submission Declined
Hey, as you have suggested me to improve my references, i have done and bu draft more better. please review it again, thanks

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Syed_Najmul_Hassan_Kararvi#Family_Life

182.189.0.73 (talk) 17:16, 24 August 2015 (UTC)MohsinRazaJ


 * Your draft is now in the queue, and will be reviewed as normal. - Happysailor  (Talk) 17:57, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

Article for creation - Genon Laboratories
Hello Happysailor.

I am quite new to Wikipedia and would like to know what I could do to have my article approved?

If I do need to provide more citations, what part of the article should I citate?

Hope you can help me out!

Thanks,

George — Preceding unsigned comment added by GeorgeNathanielHepburn (talk • contribs) 11:08, 24 August 2015 (UTC)


 * You have failed to show their notability. You must provide references that shows they have received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. References that show they are 'affiliated' are not enough. - Happysailor  (Talk) 17:58, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

20:18:19, 24 August 2015 review of submission by Gitlocker
Hi Happysailor, Thank you for reviewing "Persian Chess" page. You declined the page for lack of references. Today I added as many references as I found to the draft page (from the encyclopedia of chess variants and the official website) Please have a look at the references and let me know if they are verifiable and if I can resubmit the page. I will not resubmit the page without being sure that the page is complete for re-submission and is controlled by an experienced wikipedia editor. Thanks again for your time, Gitlocker (talk) 20:18, 24 August 2015 (UTC)gitlocker

Gitlocker (talk) 20:18, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

AfC/R
Hi Happysailor. I appreciate your eagerness to help with various administrative tasks such as Articles for Creation. I wanted to let you know that when you archived some of the threads from Articles for creation/Redirects today, it rather messes with my schedule of doing this, as I am the main coordinator for the page. If I ever need assistance with the archiving for some reason, I might let you know, however it is much easier for me if just left to one person. Also, each request should be left unarchived for at least 24 hours to give the person who requested it a chance to see whether their request was accepted. Thanks,  Rcsprinter123    (comment)  @ 19:15, 25 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi Rcsprinter123, thanks for the message, a couple of things however:
 * I've been working, replying to, and archiving redirect requests since 2010, so it's not like I've appeared from nowhere. I'm not new to this.
 * If you notice, I have been leaving completed requests on the page for at least 24 hours before archiving.
 * I had noticed that you were archiving the page regularly recently (thus haven't been doing it myself), but as you've been away from Wikipedia for part of this month and the page was getting unwieldy, I stepped in and carried on with what i've done in the past
 * I appreciate that you consider yourself the coordinator for the page, and appreciate the work you do, but leaving messages for established editors who have been doing the task for 5 years basically telling them to stop because you want to do it yourself (and insinuating that I've done it wrong) is a little off.
 * I've got no problem with you carrying on archiving the page, but I do check it regularly, and if I see it getting unwieldy again, i will archive it. - Happysailor  (Talk) 20:06, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry if what I said above kind of gave the wrong tone; it was recycled. Basically, I always leave the page until there are 30 sections before archiving, and other people kind of getting in the way just complicates the daily schedule. I've been back since the 18th August, just so you know.  Rcsprinter123    (rhapsodise)  @ 20:13, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

Atlanta Jewish Academy
Hi there! You declined Atlanta Jewish Academy because it wasn't notable enough. AJA is the merger of two schools, one of which had a Wikipedia page. So by the transitive property of notability :) AJA should be notable, right? Thanks, Lmusher (talk) 02:16, 28 August 2015 (UTC)lmusher
 * Unforunately no, as explained by Huon, your draft does not pass the notability guidelines, thus the decline. - Happysailor  (Talk) 10:11, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Sophie Bennet-Heap
Hello Happysailor. This article, which you rightly declined, wasn't in fact mine: I merely edited it so as to display the content. You may want to post to the talk page of the IP who created it (101.98.139.229), although I have tried to tell them what's what Noyster (talk),  09:08, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * You were notified because your must have submitted it (it's the only way your name could have been in the template) - Happysailor  (Talk) 10:12, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Notability of SA murder victim
Hi Happysailor

I have a problem with your decline of my article on Keanu Badenhorst. We in South Africa are dying in the most horrific murders, and the media, which is controlled by the ANC through BEE, does not report on it. I specifically made this entry regarding a 16 year old boy who was once again murdered in this country by our murderous thugs, to give him a legacy, so that his death was not in vain too. What makes Michael Brown notable, but not Keanu Badenhorst? The difference is the media coverage and the fact that Keany was just a boy at home, attacked and killed by 5 robbers, whereas Brown was a robber killed by a policeman. Michael Brown's death was notable because of widespread media reporting. Keanu should be just as notable, but because our press does not spread it, it is not worthy?

There is NO reason why any murder on innocent children should not be notable! Please advise, the reference I gave was from Independent Online Media. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaco Zaayman (talk • contribs) 07:20, 29 August 2015 (UTC)


 * All articles must show notability, which is shown by providing references to reliable sources. if you cannot provide reliable sources to show notability, then unfortunately, he won't be getting an article. - Happysailor  (Talk) 10:14, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Noble Party of Minnesota
I've read your response. However you did no reference checks. This is not good faith as an editor or a publisher. The Nobel Party was formed in Minnesota as an Association a Political Party. The Association serves a King. Concerning other refernces Prince hall cannot verify that the Noble party serves a King because they are not apart of. However they can verify that I became a Mason in Korea. Including Albert Pike. I suggest you contact the Secretary of State of Minnesota and re- submit my article. It is a business article and not historical. Please be in good faith. You can also contact me at. I am also looking forward to writing a book. concerning the Noble Party. My email is. The Noble Party was incorparted while the King was at the VOA and the VOA was it's reference address only. However it is soon to change its address very soon.Theron Preston Washington (talk) 18:24, 29 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi Theron, I can only assume (as your draft was deleted by an administrator) that the style, tone and content of your draft suggested that it was either a joke, or hoax. If you had included references I would have looked at them, so I can only assume that you either did not include any references in your draft, or that they were not clear.
 * Wikipedia relies upon the fact that you need to show significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject to show notability. Failure to do that means your article may/will be deleted. See Verifiability, not truth. It is not up to me to find the references etc for your draft/article. You must include links to these reliable references in your draft.article, so we can verify them (without resorting to telephoning or emailing people).
 * You are free to look at creating a new draft regarding the party, however I would suggest you read the following guidelines etc. before doing so: - Happysailor  (Talk) 18:36, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * General Notability Guideline
 * Verifiability
 * No original research

My page Cort Knoxx
my page was moved from user to draft? Is that a bad thing? I just wanted to get moved from user to article so the user part wont be in front of the name. I have changed some things according to guidlines and hope this can get moved to a public space viewable by google seach etc.

Thank You

Cort Knoxx 19:24, 31 August 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cortknoxx (talk • contribs)


 * Can you move it back to user? I did not create wiki page on my own. Cort Knoxx 19:31, 31 August 2015 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cortknoxx (talk • contribs)


 * It is against Wikipedia rules for articles to stay in user-space. It is not ready for mainspace, thus it's been moved to drafts. Look at what has been said. to show significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject to show notability.OR, show that he passes the notability guidelines for musicians etc.. - Happysailor  (Talk) 19:32, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

C.T. Jasper history-merge request

 * At 17:38, 2 September 2015‎ User:Happysailor requested User:Legog/sandbox to be history-merged to Draft:C.T. Jasper. But there is a complicated history here including several lengths of edit history:-
 * In Draft:C.T. Jasper, visible edits from 15:05, 1 September 2015 to 14:14, 2 September 2015‎, by Legog
 * In Draft:C.T. Jasper, about 50 deleted edits, with what looks like a new start at 13:22, 1 August 2015 by Legog and deleted at 17:31, 7 August 2015 by FoCuSandLeArN as copyvio.
 * In User:Legog/sandbox, about 25 edits, with what looks like a new start at 13:22, 1 August 2015 by Legog
 * What is to be done with which of these while avoiding WP:Parallel histories? 14:01, 3 September 2015‎ User:Anthony Appleyard


 * : I think, all told, a change of plan. Since Chess declined the sandbox as a copyvio, I've taken a deeper look at Draft:C.T. Jasper, and put it through the CV detector, and it's mostly all a CV as well, so I don't think it's worth merging, since they're both looking at deletion due to copyright violations. - Happysailor  (Talk) 16:14, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Thanks
Hello HappySailor, Thanks for editing my article on https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Runcie_C._W._Chidebe I am new on Wikipedia, though I have had Wikipedia account since 2011. Please how can I improve my article more to ensure it didn't get denied for the second time. I will be glad if you can help me further review. I also can I create more articles? Runciecwc (talk) 22:14, 31 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Take a look at WP:FIRST which gives help for creating pages.
 * Remember you need to show significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject to show notability as well - Happysailor  (Talk) 16:18, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

13:52:33, 2 September 2015 review of submission by Dguiccia
Hi Happysailor, following your recommendations I have completed the article with a number of additional references pointing to verifiable sources, showing clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.

(1) This source is an existing Wikipedia article titled "List of education facilities in San Antonio" that reports the St. Matthew Catholic School of San Antonio in the "Private" schools section. Please note that other schools in the same list already have a dedicated Wikipedia article similar to this one.

(2) This is a reference to an official government website that provides official data (e.g. Grade Span, Total Students,...etc) about the St. Matthew Catholic School of San Antonio reported in this article.

(3) This is a page from the official website of the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of San Antonio (see also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_Catholic_Archdiocese_of_San_Antonio) which lists the St. Matthew Catholic School of San Antonio among one of the schools of the Archdiocese as reported in this article.

(4) An article in the KSAT News website (KSAT is the official TV news channel in San Antonio, Texas) that talks about the St. Matthew Catholic School of San Antonio, and, in particular provides additional useful information about the most recent inspection passed by the St. Matthew Catholic School of San Antonio.

I hope that, now that the article has been completed with this list of additional references, it will be soon moved from draft to published status.

THANK YOU for your help, dguiccia

Dguiccia (talk) 13:52, 2 September 2015 (UTC)


 * You're still not showing significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject to show notability. Your using primary references which do not show notability, and wikipedia which is not valid as a references. You need reliable third party references. See WP:42 - Happysailor  (Talk) 16:22, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

defencesynergia
Defencesynergia. Hi Happysailor,

I'm really new at this and to be quite honest bewildered by the number of help pages and tutorials.

I edited the DS page and it was declined again even though I added a number of extra reference. I admit its untidy and probably in a bad format, but I do need serious help with my first page. I'm stumped on how to get more reliable sources other than the UK government's own documents and official reports. I would cite this page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UK_National_Defence_Association who's references are all newspaper reports, yet was published. I do know a lot of the work Defencesynergia do is under Chatham house rules and therefore not in the public domain, but the DefenceSynergia think tank exists and is already referenced under this wiki article: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Osborne_Waddell. And I just found another news source here:http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/new-us-fighter-jet-on-course-to-becoming-one-of-historys-biggest-white-elephants-10238761.html

Your help would be greatly appreciated. Phalanxstar (talk) 17:25, 2 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Take a look at what Prymshbmg said, you need better sources as you need to show significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject to show notability. - Happysailor  (Talk) 16:25, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:WEATNU
Hello, I'm writing on the article page for WEATNU, we have plenty of references, as we are reviewed by blogs, online magazine and many artists who use WEATNU. I am not versed with proper formatting on wiki, as it's mostly confusing to me. If you could edit it properly then I could continue. All our refs are indie refs.

This should be a page not so much an article

Please let me know.

Thanks.

SynthoElectro (talk) 23:41, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

That's a problem, as Wikipedia is for articles. You need to show significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject to show notability, so blogs etc are not suitable. - Happysailor  (Talk) 16:26, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

07:54:54, 3 September 2015 review of submission by Sandeep mash
Sandeep mash (talk) 07:54, 3 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Did you have a question? because your article was declined because it failed WP:BIO. You need to show significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject to show notability. Social media etc is NOT suitable. - Happysailor  (Talk) 16:27, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

20:42:34, 3 September 2015 review of submission by Dguiccia
Hi HappySailor,

I have just updated again the article and it is now definitely showing significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject to show notability. Thank you for pointing me in the right direction. In fact, I realized I forgot to include in the article two important sources which are now in the article: I have just added the citation of two separate BOOKS "published by respected publishing houses" that I have used as primary sources. You can now see that these citations have now been added to the article in the section "Books". The publishing houses of these two books that I have used as primary sources are very respected: (1) Pelican Publishing - http://pelicanpub.com/ - Formed in 1926, Pelican is the largest independent trade book publisher located in the U.S (2) Liturgical Press‎ - http://www.litpress.org/LP/About_Us/ - Liturgical Press began publishing for the Church in 1926 is one of the most recognized houses in Catholic publishing

I hope you will agree with me that the article is now compliant with Wikipedia's publication requirements. THANK YOU for your cooperation.

Dguiccia (talk) 20:42, 3 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi. You have resubmitted it so it is now in the review queue. For a note, your setill relying on primary sources too much. - Happysailor  (Talk) 11:40, 7 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Hi HappySailor,
 * I'm confident that this time the article will be accepted. As you know, according to Wikipedia, "the distinction between primary and secondary sources is subjective and contextual, so that precise definitions are difficult to make. This article about the St. Matthew Catholic School contains the required amount of reliable secondary/primary sources and I'm very confident that it will pass the review process.
 * Once again, thank you for your cooperation.
 * Dguiccia (talk) 21:29, 7 September 2015 (UTC)


 * That's fine, however out of the 7 sources you have, 4 are primary sources, so don't show notability, 2 are directories that only list the school, so again do not really show notability, and the final reference gives only a mention that the school had a perfect score in an inspection. Therefore, at the moment i'd say that there is still a notability issue on your draft.
 * I'm going to leave the next review to another editor so you have another opinion, but take a look at this content guideline about reliable sources. - Happysailor  (Talk) 21:47, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Request on 05:16:15, 8 September 2015 for assistance on AfC submission by Sandeep mash
Hi We, from the Team of Sandeep Maheshwari are trying to create a Wikipedia Page of Sandeep Maheshwari. Since we are new to this entire process, kindly guide us on how to create a page.

Best Regards Team, Sandeep Maheshwari info@sandeepmaheshwari.com

Sandeep mash (talk) 05:16, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Editing my article
Hi Happysailor

Can i edit my article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ciskk (talk • contribs) 22:24, 7 September 2015 (UTC)


 * As per WP:ANYONE – You're free to edit almost any article except the one are semi-protected which needs to be edited with a care. MONARCH ♔ 07:22, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

15:44:12, 8 September 2015 review of submission by Domiriat
Hi Happysailor, Thank you for reviewing the article in such a short time. I must admit that it was lacking a lot of things (from relevant content to references). I improved it and hopefully I managed to prove that George Quinn is notable and it is in the interest of the public to have an article about it on Wikipedia. I will deeply appreciate if you can review the article again and tell me what you think! Thanks!--Domiriat (talk) 15:44, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

Domiriat (talk) 15:44, 8 September 2015 (UTC)