User talk:Hapsoever

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Kayden Kross. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 09:37, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kayden Kross, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. She was prosecuted on those charges. Wikipedia is not an autobiography where her word overrides the press. Morbidthoughts (talk) 05:21, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Kayden Kross, you may be blocked from editing. ''She also pled no contest to a misdemeanor. Just because some of the charges were dismissed doesn't mean we don't mention the story.'' Morbidthoughts (talk) 06:41, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

December 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Kayden Kross. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Morbidthoughts (talk) 09:37, 10 December 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Kayden Kross, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. She was prosecuted on those charges. Wikipedia is not an autobiography where her word overrides the press. Morbidthoughts (talk) 05:21, 13 December 2010 (UTC)

(BLPs)must be written conservatively and with regard for the subject's privacy. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid: it is not Wikipedia's job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives, and the possibility of harm to living subjects must always be considered when exercising editorial judgment. Wikipedia is NOT biased. Article submission of Kayden Kross was valid information, you may be blocked from editing. Hapsoever (talk) 06:54, 13 December 2010 (UTC)