User talk:Haqinam01

Welcome!
Hello, Haqinam01, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! AR.00148 (talk) 20:05, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Four Arms Of Value (FAV)


The article Four Arms Of Value (FAV) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:NESSAY, this is clearly an essay.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:32, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Four Arms Of Value (FAV)


A tag has been placed on Four Arms Of Value (FAV), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:45, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Four Arms Of Value (FAV) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Four Arms Of Value (FAV) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Four Arms Of Value (FAV) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 20:46, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Haqinam01 (talk) 21:02, 1 May 2015 (UTC)First person references removed. Not promoting anyone here just sharing a very good piece of informationHaqinam01 (talk) 21:02, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Hello, I'm C.Fred. I noticed that you made a comment on the page Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Four Arms Of Value (FAV) that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 21:17, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Copyright concerns
Greetings! Can you change the copyright terms at your website to make clear that the definitions at http://lam-inc.com/four-arms-of-value-assessment/ are under a free license? Otherwise, we will have to delete the definition of Four Arms Of Value (FAV) as a copyright violation. —C.Fred (talk) 21:39, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Haqinam01 (talk) 21:47, 1 May 2015 (UTC)Sure C.Fred. How do you recommend we do that? Thanks!Haqinam01 (talk) 21:47, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * WP:Donating copyrighted materials has instructions. —C.Fred (talk) 21:49, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Haqinam01 (talk) 21:54, 1 May 2015 (UTC)Hi the website is already updated. Please look at the bottom. Let me know if there is anything else we need to addHaqinam01 (talk) 21:54, 1 May 2015 (UTC)


 * You should add some reliable sources to the article. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:03, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Haqinam01 (talk) 22:08, 1 May 2015 (UTC)Joseph Is this not a reliable source: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2085119Haqinam01 (talk) 22:08, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The problem with that source is it's a primary source. Papers written by the subject of an article, or its creator, or any other party with a relationship or conflict of interest, cannot be used to establish notability.
 * What would be acceptable as a secondary source is a newspaper article or magazine column that covers the concept in significant detail. A one-line mention in a list of theories is not enough; the journalist needs to really talk about FAV in depth. —C.Fred (talk) 22:10, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Haqinam01 (talk) 22:14, 1 May 2015 (UTC)Would this not be a secondary source: http://bizshifts-trends.com/2012/12/17/leadership-is-value-creation-and-value-creation-is-leadership-connecting-ideas-people-passion-results-maker-vs-taker/Haqinam01 (talk) 22:14, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Not really. Even though the work was quoted, it was only quoted in a blog. That's not anywhere near the same as a scholarly citation. —C.Fred (talk) 22:31, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Four Arms Of Value (FAV)


A tag has been placed on Four Arms Of Value (FAV) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://lam-inc.com/four-arms-of-value-assessment/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:43, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Haqinam01 (talk) 22:25, 1 May 2015 (UTC)copyright terms at sourcer website to make clear that the definitions at http://lam-inc.com/four-arms-of-value-assessment/ are under a free licenseHaqinam01 (talk) 22:25, 1 May 2015 (UTC)


 * It is clear now, but not when I added this. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:28, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Stay off my talkpage
This is a note that due to your uncivil comments towards me at Articles for deletion/Four Arms Of Value (FAV), I do not want you posting on my userpage ever again. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:59, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Haqinam01 (talk) 22:03, 1 May 2015 (UTC)My apologiesHaqinam01 (talk) 22:03, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Haqinam01 (talk) 22:03, 1 May 2015 (UTC)Didnt mean to be rudeHaqinam01 (talk) 22:03, 1 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Apology clearly fake, not accepted. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:29, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Haqinam01 (talk) 22:32, 1 May 2015 (UTC)That's rather harsh. How would you like me to apologize?Haqinam01 (talk) 22:32, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Haqinam01. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Four Arms Of Value (FAV), you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies. Note that Wikipedia's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:59, 1 May 2015 (UTC)

Haqinam01, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
 The Adventure