User talk:Hardeep balli

August 2023
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  MrOllie (talk) 14:17, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 15:16, 12 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Dear Wikipedia Editorial Team,
 * I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to appeal for the reinstatement of a link that I recently updated on a Wikipedia page. The previous link had become outdated and expired, and I took the initiative to replace it with a new link that contains the most current and relevant information.
 * I understand that Wikipedia's guidelines are in place to maintain the quality and accuracy of information on the platform. My intention in updating the link was solely to ensure that readers have access to the latest information on the topic. Unfortunately, it appears that the new link I provided has been blocked.
 * I kindly request that you review my edit and reconsider the inclusion of the updated link. I have taken care to verify the authenticity and relevance of the new link to ensure that it aligns with Wikipedia's standards. The updated link provides valuable and accurate information that would greatly benefit readers seeking the latest insights on the subject matter.
 * If there were any issues with the link I provided or its content, I am more than willing to address them. I am committed to upholding Wikipedia's principles and contributing positively to the platform's knowledge base.
 * Please let me know if there are any specific steps I need to follow or any additional information I should provide to support my appeal. I am open to any suggestions or guidance you may have.
 * Thank you for considering my request. I am eager to collaborate in order to maintain the integrity and currency of the information available to Wikipedia's users. I look forward to a favorable response. Hardeep balli (talk) 15:47, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I would be surprised if you convince anyone with this nonsense. Also, say hi to ChatGPT for me. You took initiave to replace a link that, while I may have been outdated (and I doubt that) with an unrealted spam link. Your intention appears to be that readers are mislead towards some random link of yours. Youre only care was to spam for some company. The issues was that it was spam. Specific steps would include not spamming. Your favorable response is nowhere coming @Hardeep balli SpaceExplorer12 (talk) 13:14, 13 August 2023 (UTC)