User talk:Hardtime2011

Speedy deletion nomination of On the Old Fall River Line


A tag has been placed on On the Old Fall River Line requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 23:46, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Below the Hill


A tag has been placed on Below the Hill requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 23:47, 5 October 2011 (UTC)

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I am trying to clarify this. The copyvios listed are from descriptive or review material used in the article, which could be removed and has been removed. For the Fall River Line, the nature of the Line is described adequately by our article on the Line, and only needs to be linked to. The NYT review is apparently from 1965 reprinted in 2011, and can only be quoted from, not reprinted entirely. But some of the the basic text of the articles appears to be from material posted at the Fall River Historical Society. This material is  under their copyright., and cannot be used unless it is donated to us following the exact procedure of WP:DCM. But this should be unnecessary--it would be much better to rewrite in your own words, using perhaps a brief quotation with an exact source.

For these two articles, I am going to do just that. But before you write any further ones, please check what I have done, and write yours similarly. We take copyright very seriously around here.

There are some other problems. Please see other Wikipedia articles for our style, and also WP:FIRST. We do not place a source or copyright or disclaimer tag in the text of an article, such as you seem to have copied from the Historical Society page. The Wikipedia software adds the necessary notices to the page for copyright and origin of the material, and we do not use disclaimer notices.

If I can help you further, please let me know on my user talk page.  DGG ( talk ) 04:55, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of On the Old Fall River Line


A tag has been placed on On the Old Fall River Line requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 06:29, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Below the Hill


The article Below the Hill has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Fails WP:NF and WP:GNG. Barely any high-quality sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 07:00, 6 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of On the Old Fall River Line for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article On the Old Fall River Line is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/On the Old Fall River Line until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 22:09, 6 October 2011 (UTC)