User talk:Hare-Yukai

on The Battle of China
I have made a Requests for page protection for The Battle of China. Please discuss with User:Blueshirts in the talk page. Thank you.Penpen0216 04:19, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thank you. We will talk together.--Hare-Yukai 07:09, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:The baby setuped by Capra s staff.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:The baby setuped by Capra s staff.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 03:49, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Fake Photograph as BuriedAlive.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Fake Photograph as BuriedAlive.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Fake Photograph as BuriedAlive.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: '''Image was uploaded purely as an attack. It's not even used in any articles. And no evidence is provided to support the claim that it is in the public domain.''' To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Fake Photograph as BuriedAlive.jpg, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Image:Fake Photograph as BuriedAlive.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:09, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Picture of smiling with army.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Picture of smiling with army.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Picture of smiling with army.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: '''Image was uploaded purely as an attack. It's not even used in any articles. And no evidence is provided to support the claim that it is in the public domain.''' To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Picture of smiling with army.jpg, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Image:Picture of smiling with army.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:23, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Anyway, this fills the condition of The Classic Photograph. I only edited it, and it is only the fact.
 * "And no evidence is provided to support the claim that it is in the public domain."
 * ↑ It is clearly mistake. Under the Japanese law. Copyright of the photograph was effective only ten years.
 * "Shina Jihen shashin zensh? (ch?): Shanhai sensen 支那事變寫真全輯 中 上海戰線, p.146, ed. Hoshino Tatsuo 星野辰男, Tokyo, 1938."
 * "写真著作権ハ十年間継続ス"
 * "(translation: copyright on photographs continue for ten years.)"--Hare-Yukai 04:45, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Fake Photograph as BuriedAlive.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Fake Photograph as BuriedAlive.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 19:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC)  Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 19:35, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Picture of smiling with army.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Picture of smiling with army.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 19:40, 29 June 2007 (UTC)  Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 19:40, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:The baby setuped by Capra s staff.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:The baby setuped by Capra s staff.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 16:14, 30 June 2007 (UTC)  Hong Qi Gong (Talk - Contribs) 16:14, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:Fake Photograph as BuriedAlive.jpg
This image has been listed for deletion AGAIN. If you want to save it I urge you to go to WP:IFD and defend it. -Nard 15:42, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The discussion is now at Deletion_review/Log/2007_July_28 if you want to comment. -Nv8200p talk 12:03, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Reply regarding Deletion review
If the earlier image uploaded by User:Johnnyboyca is in the public domain, I see no reason why the second one is not in the public domain as well. Based on the evidence presented, there is no compelling case for a conspiracy theory. It seems to be a simple case of the original being folded when copied years ago, and then another faithful reproduction from the original corrected this later. Wikipedia is not a battleground to prove conspiracy theories. This is an interesting issue, and I appreciate you bringing it to the community's attention in connection with the first image. If you feel there are still copyright issues with the second image, feel free to re-nominate it at WP:IFD. Regards, IronGargoyle 07:19, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
 * A discussion of your re-uploading of Image:Fake Photograph as BuriedAlive.jpg has been started here. Best, IronGargoyle 18:55, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! I didn't think anyone had properly welcomed you. Chris 05:53, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Image:Fake Photograph as BuriedAlive.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Fake Photograph as BuriedAlive.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -Nard 00:43, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Battle of China
Please provide sources (Read WP:V if you are not sure what is required). Otherwise your edits will continue to be reverted. -- Миборовский 05:49, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Please show the scene of 27min27sec. --Hare-Yukai 05:59, 18 August 2007 (UTC)


 * The Battle of China download on the Internet Archive
 * I have the movie and I have watched it, and nowhere does it indicate anything that your edits are suggesting. You need to back your edit up with valid, verifiable sources, which self-published youtube videos are NOT. -- Миборовский 06:04, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * You say a lie. There is no meaning that you mentioned. --Hare-Yukai 07:50, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * You say a lie. There is no meaning that you mentioned. --Hare-Yukai 07:50, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Images_and_media_for_deletion/2007_August_19
Hong Qi Gong is crazy! --Hare-Yukai 09:09, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

3RR
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. nattang 16:30, 18 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Read the article carefully. You were emotional and neglected a proper countermeasure. And you did revert which persons who conflict each other don't hope for together. It's called the Destructive Revert. --Hare-Yukai 01:05, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:The Buttle of the China2.jpg
I understand that only part of this image comes from the film. What is the source of the rest of the image, and who made this composite image? Thank you. -- But | seriously | folks   14:31, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
 * I got this image from Rabota(image). Please ask him directly. He knows details. --Hare-Yukai 14:52, 19 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, thank you. -- But | seriously | folks   15:01, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:The_Buttle_of_the_China2.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:The_Buttle_of_the_China2.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  But | seriously | folks   17:38, 19 August 2007 (UTC)

Once again, about Verifiability
WP:V is an official policy that may not be contravened. So until you can furnish your claims with reliable, published, third party sources, it fails the criteria set forth by WP:V and should be removed. -- Миборовский 03:43, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

 But | seriously | folks   19:37, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Er, this isn't a matter of "we don't care," it's a matter of "what IP address are you talking about?" -- because we really have no idea, you haven't told us. – Luna Santin  (talk) 17:37, 20 August 2007 (UTC)


 * This is just bullying and goes against Wikipedia Sprit clearly. There is no reason that Hare-Yukai are blocked. rabota 19:37, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * He's not blocked anymore, but when he was blocked, it was proper because he violated WP:3RR. Edit warring is bad.  Use the talk pages.  Thank you. --  But | seriously | folks   19:37, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * They are...I don't say who they are....they have been deleting unfavorable information and inconvenient articles for them by drawing many voters from other factions...therefore, the person who tries to add new information somehow must always handle 3RR risk...I think this is theire entrapment. I would like to debete with them but they always try to escape from the debate...why?  I wonder whether Wikipedia is right? rabota 20:10, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * If they are in the majority, they will have the largest say in the eventual consensus. That's how Wikipedia works.  I know it's frustrating, but we're not allowed to have articles read the way we want through edit warring.  We have to find another way.  Be creative if necessary.  Suggest alternate ways of presenting the information.  Sometimes, presenting both viewpoints as equal without suggesting that either is correct is the solution (as long as the reliable sources permit this result). --  But | seriously | folks   20:38, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The decision is ineffective if even agreement decision of the majority violates the natural science theory or law reason. It cann't be decided by the decision by majority of the community. Isn't it being written in somewhere of the Wikipedia? --Hare-Yukai 10:10, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
 * That's one of the beautiful yet imperfect facets of Wikipedia. Remember, though, that they have to cite reliable sources in support, so they can't go as crazy as you have suggested. --  But | seriously | folks   11:12, 21 August 2007 (UTC)