User talk:Harebag/archive 1



{| width="100%" style="background:transparent"
 * style="width: 50%; border:1px solid #; background-color:#; vertical-align:top"|

1. Please sign your messages so people know who is writing them and can write back to you. You do this by clicking on the 4 squiggly lines about 3 inches below the box where you type. 2. There are people who search for things to delete. Don't ask me why. 3. To add references, type in the reference after your sentence. For example, type "Boston is the capital of Massachusetts." then after the period type a then http.so and so then < then / then ref then >. I can't do it here otherwise the computer will make my example into a footnote and you then wouldn't be able to see it. The at the bottom, type { then { then reflist then } then } so that the references will print up as a list. Another way is just to pull up an article, push the "edit this page" and see how the computer source is written and copy it for your article.VK35 21:02, 6 April 2007 (UTC) --- I don't know the answers to your questions. Just wait and see. I wouldn't do 20 articles at once until you get a feel of what's accepted and what's not. I'm the wrong person to ask. Don't worry, people will come around. They did to my article within a day or two.VK35 21:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Hello
Hi Harebag! Welcome! When I saw the article on the Pigeon Force Police Department, I thought it was a joke. It is real. I also started a new article on Larry Buendorf. He's a secret service agent that wrestled a presidential assassin to the ground. Any suggestions for improvement, let me know. As for your article, I suggest a little background. Mention the city and state name. Fix the link. Good Luck on editing! VK35 19:29, 6 April 2007 (UTC) --- Additional suggestions for Pigeon Force PD: Who's the chief? Any major history? Big crime solved? Any controversy or major lawsuit against it? When was it established? Was the area patrolled by the county sheriff before then and then the city was established (if so when?). These are just tips. Otherwise, there is a risk that someone will petition for the article's deletion because there is a board for that (thus destroying your hard work). That's the reason that I wrote quite a bit about my new article first rather than just start out with a few sentences and add to it slowly. I do plan to add more to my article, though.VK35 20:40, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created yourself. If you do not believe the article deserves to be deleted, then please place  on the page (please do not remove any existing speedy deletion tag) and make your case on the article's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 21:46, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
 * In response to your comment here: I had originally marked the Pigeon Forge Police Department article for speedy deletion because I didn't think that it met notability requirements.  The policy for speedy deletion templates is that they cannot be removed by the creator of the article (whether you agree or not).  It is up to an admin to remove the template if they think that the article should not be deleted.  I'm not putting the template back for now, but just keep the policy in mind for the future.  See WP:SPEEDY.  I suggest that you continue to improve the article to assert its notability so it doesn't end up deleted.  Also see WP:NOTABILITY.  -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 21:57, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

--- In response to your question - When gathering information from another web site, you need to be careful to not violate the source's copyright, see WP:COPYVIO. The best thing to do is to paraphrase the content that you want to include and then reference the source see WP:REF. Never copy and paste information into an article. As far as using images, I am not an expert on the subject - check WP:IMAGE for info. Let me know if you have any additional concerns and I will try to help. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 03:34, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

Edits to Pigeon Forge Police Department
Yes, I edited the Pigeon Forge Police Department in an attempt to prevent it from being deleted. Editing is allowed for anyone. Still, I hope you don't mind. I didn't want your great idea to be deleted. I see that you edited out that the PD was notable for having a SWAT team despite the city's size. The reason I put that there is because it is a valid reason which makes the article notable. Notability is a key factor in preventing an article's deletion.VK35 21:37, 10 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Look Here...[]. Do you want me to adopt you, i.e. pay closer attention to you, give advice, answer questions?VK35  22:27, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

Ownership
You do not "own" articles you create on Wikipedia ... please read Ownership of articles, which is an official policy.

Do not remove tags added by other editors who question an article's notability or lack of sources ... read Attribution ... repeated removal of tags can get you blocked from editing ... see WP:3RR. &mdash; 17:47, 11 April 2007 (UTC)

Adoption
I would be very happy to adopt you. I am very flattered by your suggestion about being an administrator. However, consider asking me again this fall as I am not yet experienced enough, in my opinion. If you don't want me to adopt you, let me know. Otherwise, I'm ready to start! On your user page, you can change the banner to { { adoptee | V K 35 } } (leave out the gaps, gaps placed so you can see the raw source data rather than a banner). Feel free to ask me about anything. I do have some suggestions about trying to keep the Pigeon Forge Police Department article alive and not have it get deleted by the "Deletion Squad"!VK35 20:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Why not either leave messages here or at my special page for you here []VK35 01:55, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
 * As your adopter, I've been asked to let you know that the top user box on your user page (VandalProof) is not supposed to be shown on the user page except for registered users. Here's a link to the information page.  []  It's a wikipedia link, not spam to an outside webpage.  It tells you how to register (free).  It also says that new users (less than 250 edits) will probably not be accepted.  It only says "probably" so you can ask, if you want. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by VK35 (talk • contribs) 17:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC).
 * Want to start a new article? This time, you can do more "walking" on your own, I'll just stand nearby and not do any editing on that article.  That doesn't mean Pigeon Forge PD is finished, it can still be fine tuned. Or, you can choose to make minor edits to pre-existing articles.  It's all up to you!VK35  17:30, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * check that message board for Gatlinburg FD info.VK35 01:39, 14 April 2007 (UTC)VK35  20:37, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:GPD_Badge.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:GPD_Badge.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 07:43, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on List of fire departments in Idaho, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hatch68 18:02, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on List of fire departments in Ohio, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hatch68 18:26, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Fire Departments
I think it's unlikely that very many individual fire departments are going to be notable enough to be included as separate articles in Wikipedia. Also, list rarely serve much purpose on Wikipedia, other than the standard list of TV episodes and such that are common on Wikipedia. Please consider all of this before creating a list of fire departments for each state. Hatch68 18:29, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Reply
Please don't make baseless accusations against me. I haven't made any "trouble" for you. I initiated a conversation about an issue and have remained courteous throughout. What is it about every fire department that you think makes them notable enough to be in an encyclopedia? Are you going to be able to provide references for every fire department that backs up that notability? If not then I will not be the only one nominating them for deletion. Please see WP:Notability. Hatch68 21:38, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I feel that you are rapidly crossing the boundary into making personal attacks and threats against me. At no point did I accuse you of making any trouble for me.  I'm curious if you actually read the entire message before you decide to respond.  The speedy deletion process is a two part process.  I nominated the articles for deletion and an administrator reviewed those requests, agreed with them, and deleted them.  Feel free to have the administrator you are in contact with to get in touch with me.  All of our edits are in the history for anyone to read and I have been patient  I will also not respond to threats.  If I see an article that I believe needs to be deleted, I will mark it so.  If you threaten me with administrative action again for no reason, I will report you.  Take a deep breath and please don't take a simple conversation so personally.  Hatch68 01:03, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I will not be intimidated into not putting proper tags on articles. If your articles met the minimum standards then there would be no need for them to be tagged.  Remember that the tags are reviewed before the articles are deleted, so it is not my decision alone that they are deleted.  Hatch68 14:26, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Hey, yourself
Will you please let me remove the { { Notability|date=April 2007 } }{ { Primarysources|date=April 2007 } } from Gatlinburg Police Department article. With those on there my reflist wont show neither will the { stub } or the internal links show. I need those removed.Harebag 14:12, 14 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Tags should not prevent anything from showing ... add some WP:RS citations to show WP:N and the tags can come off ... read Attribution and find some citation's of notability other than the subject's website. &mdash; 15:47, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on List of fire departments in Tennessee, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hatch68 15:54, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Lee patton chiles
I have nominiated this page for speedy deletion because it is the talk page for an article that no longer exists. However, I saw your comments on the page and I wanted to touch base with you about something that you said. You commented: "I am a recent changes patroller and . . . " and continued with your statement as to why you felt the article should not be deleted. I am also a recent changes patroller and I wanted to let you know that it is a completely voluntary position and it carries no extra weight in discussions--it's just something that we can do to help out around Wikipedia. As such, it isn't really worth including when you're making statements--it would be like saying "I've got blue eyes and I think that . . . " If you feel that a Speedy Deletion isn't justified (and you are not the creator of the article), then you may remove the speedy deletion tag. It would also be helpful if you explained your justification on the talk page (or in your edit summary). These are things that any editor may do--it has nothing to do with being a recent changes patroller. However, just because you feel the creator of the article didn't completely understand policy is not a reason to refrain from deleting an article. Speedy deletion isn't a punishment--it is a way of quickly removing inappropriate articles. Please let me know if you have any questions. Note: I didn't see the original article, so I don't know anything about the placement of the tags or why it was deleted. janejellyroll 01:40, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Regarding your response on my talk page: Whoa--I didn't mean to upset you. I was just trying to give you some information. Of course you may remove speedy deletion tags if you feel they are not justified--any editor (with the exception of the editor who created the article) may do so. However, please don't use time spent in creating the article as a reason for removing the tag--that doesn't have a basis in Wikipedia policy. Again, I'm sorry for upsetting you and I never implied that I was perfect. I have received lots of help from other editors since my beginnings and I was just trying to pass it on. janejellyroll 01:50, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

New pages patroller
In response to your message here. I think it's great that you want to be a new pages patroller. But you can't really expect to be able to remain anonymous. It's very easy for the creator of the article to see who put the delete tag on it. Also, it's only reasonable that the creator should know who thinks their article should be deleted. You have a right to be bold and do what you think is right, but you also need to be held accountable if someone disagrees with you. No reasonable editor is going to vandalize your articles. If they do, there are processes for dealing with such vandals. And remember, it's never personal. Good luck. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 03:03, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Hay is for horses
In response to your question here. Only administrators can delete articles. You can just tag them for deletion, they decide. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 12:44, 16 April 2007 (UTC)

Merge Discussion
I've tried to offer a reasonable compromise on the non-notable police department articles you've created, but I gather from your deletion of the merge and notability templates with no comments about them that you're not going to be reasonable about it. I'll be putting WP:AFD templates on the articles now so a consensus can be reached about them. Hatch68 21:22, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

We need to talk..See message boardVK35 01:40, 22 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Cut Bank Police Department
An editor has nominated Cut Bank Police Department, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Gatlinburg Public Services
An editor has nominated Gatlinburg Public Services, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Gallatin County Sheriff's Office
An editor has nominated Gallatin County Sheriff's Office, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Bristol Tennessee Police Department
An editor has nominated Bristol Tennessee Police Department, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Gatlinburg Fire Department
An editor has nominated Gatlinburg Fire Department, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Pigeon Forge Public Services
An editor has nominated Pigeon Forge Public Services, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Kingsport Police Department
An editor has nominated Kingsport Police Department, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:58, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Redirect
Please do not redirect articles that have been recommended for deletion. It isn't appropriate as it disrupts our processes. Since no one deleted these articles outright already, their continued existence bears some discussion. Another admin's opinion, however, may differ, and he or she might close the discussion early. If you like, you can add your own thoughts on this matter to each of these articles' AfD pages. At the very least, you might consider the deletion discussion to be an opportunity to learn more about how we apply our notability standards. Rklawton 01:03, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Your VandalProof Application
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Harebag. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. The reason for this is that:

You do not yet been actively editing Wikipedia for long enough ( > 1 month).

Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. A le_Jrb talk 16:00, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Sevier County Sheriff's Office
An editor has nominated Sevier County Sheriff's Office, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:04, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Sullivan County Tennessee Sheriff's Office
An editor has nominated Sullivan County Tennessee Sheriff's Office, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:04, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Roanoke City Sheriff's Office
An editor has nominated Roanoke City Sheriff's Office, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:04, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Your editcount
First, you should realize that editcountitis is not healthy. But to answer your question; what probably happened is some of the pages that you created got deleted. When that happens, all of your edits get deleted with them. Also, you may have checked your edit count on a day that you had tagged several articles for deletion. When they get deleted, your edit count goes down. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 22:56, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Answer: Yes. -- Mufka (user) (talk) (contribs) 00:18, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

adoption
woah...

"In the future I would appreciate it if you would not ask to adopt users." are you kidding me ? for the record i have 8 (with 2 of those on wikibreak) and the others are other peoples adoptees that i help out with. please be civil when speaking with other people, as just asking me would have gotten you some adoptees. Matthew Yeager 00:46, 4 May 2007 (UTC)


 * i hope i did take it out of context. i was only trying to get the adoptees and adopters active. we are sending out messages to the adopters shortly to get them into the AAU talk so that we can make some changes to how the program works, remove the backlog, and start teaching users! i'd more then happy to pass some adoptees to you. i just wish if you were looking for some users to adopt that you would have say "hello, i'm looking for some users to adopt". let me know how many you would like and we can get things started ! Matthew Yeager 04:14, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

new adoptees
Here you go buddy, if you need any help with them or have any questions just let me know. Sweboi Wondle donkey Zenazn Matthew Yeager 01:03, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Adityakt 03:47, 10 May 2007 (UTC)Adityakt

hi sir,i want to be adopted by you.

I have been working on an article about my favorite radio host, Bryan Styble, and I would greatly appreciate some help on what I could do better/what needs to be done.

thanks, Wondle donkey 20:27, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I'm currently working on a rewrite go the article on the now mainly defunct shipyard Kockums. I wonder, once attaching a "under construction" template how long do I have to complete the article, I expect this article to need a complete revamp as it's very out of date and factually incorrect.

Thanks, --Sweboi 21:51, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Deleting content
You do know only sysops can delete content, right? Doing so only blanks the page if you don't have the proper tools. Just leave it be until you get them. But, keep working up that edit count! &mdash; B o L 05:15, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I already know that but there is no point in having useless crap on there like the article called ****ing doyle. He used about 6 f words and never censored them. I delete worthless content not because of a higher post count but because it is what it is, WORTHLESS!69.145.163.26 (talk) 17:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Production_Issues
Please do not delete Production_Issues. Implemnetation_Issues, it's sister article, has been in-place for almost a year with no problems...except for the fact that it has a link back to Production_Issues which was speedily deleted last time.

Thanks in advance for your dialog with me instead of deleting my article,

Alz. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Alzuun (talk • contribs) 22:35, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
I noticed the message you recently left to. Please remember to try not to bite the newcomers. If you see someone make a common mistake, try to politely point out what they did wrong and how to correct it. ''I think you should review WP:Civil. Calling a new editor's contribution "crap" is not constructive. Toddst1 (talk) 01:04, 25 January 2008 (UTC)'' Toddst1 (talk) 01:04, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Response
Your post is most uncivil and a personal attack. Perhaps stubs annoy you, but they are perfectly valid. Try nominating any of them for deletion to find out. Your warning is both in appropriate and deserving of a counter-warning. I see that you are biting lots of people, so take the rest of the day off and cool down.

This is your only warning. The next time you make a personal attack, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.

Carlossuarez46 (talk) 01:08, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Chill out
Your comment to User talk:Dark knight123 was also inappropriate. Time to take a break and chill out. Toddst1 (talk) 01:10, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion notices
Speedy deletion reasons like "Worthless and invalid crap" and "useless" are not productive, and violate WP:CIVIL. Please refrain from using similar remarks in the future. It would be appreciated if you used the proper speedy templates, such as for unremarkable biographies,  for nonsense pages,  for articles lacking context, etc.  Thanks, Resolute 01:12, 25 January 2008 (UTC)

Murder in the middle pasture
I have removed the speedy tag you added to this article. A quick look behind the link to the article on the series would have shown you that this subject is a real book, and that the appropriate course of action would be to clean the article up, not speedy it (especially with an uncivil comment). As a fellow crap-fighter I appreciate your enthusiasm but try and cool down that itchy trigger finger, n'k? Thanks. Dethme0w (talk) 01:14, 25 January 2008 (UTC)