User talk:Haredapang

deletion
I deleted your recent article because it did not provide independent verifiable sources that it meets the notability guidelines, unlike the other restaurant you mentioned, which is a world class restaurant. Your "references" were just links to the restaurants.

It could also have been deleted as an advertisement. No independent sources for it being very popular among local Chinese and foreign visitors, and it's difficult to see why an encyclopaedia article needs links to each restaurant website

 Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  16:32, 17 June 2010 (UTC)


 * It still has the spammy claim about being very popular among local Chinese and foreign visitors, with no independent sources to support this, but it's better. You still need references, for example to verify the claimed awards  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  05:42, 18 June 2010 (UTC)


 * I've fixed the refs to be inline. I wouldn't delete it now, although obviously that's not binding on other admins  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  07:29, 18 June 2010 (UTC)