User talk:Harfajardo

In response to your feedback
Hi Harfajardo. Yes, it can be a bit confusing switching from HTML to WikiMarkup. You might find the cheatsheet of markup commands or the full listing useful in making the transfer. This page also lists the HTML commands that Wikipedia can cope with, for reference. Thankfully, you'll rarely need any of the more obscure markup syntax in regular editing.

Yunshui 雲‍水 09:17, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

&#160;

Help me
hi I have a question, we have around 17references for a single word in the article I'm writing, and the citations/superscripts in the article itself look like a handful. is there a way to trim it down or make it look more pleasing without cutting down on the references?
 * Sure: Please see WP:BUNDLING. If you need help with it, please feel free to drop by my talk page. Essentially though, where you have , you would replace it with one citation, with the in between references spaced with   (paragraph breaks) and * (bullet markup). So it would become The problem with this is that it will not work for named references used more than once. If you have a mix of those, then you can bundle just the references that are used once, and keep the named reference used more than once unmodified. Althernatively, you can bundle them all, but then for the next use of any citations you were using more than once, you will have to reenter the full citation, and there will be some redundancy in the reference list.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 13:01, 25 May 2012 (UTC)