User talk:Hargrimm/File-C

Steward vote
Notice; Your vote for Stewards/elections 2006 is canceld.  Anyone can vote provided that he/she has a valid account on meta with a link to at least one user page, on a project where the editor is a participant, with at least 3 months participation (not just to his/her userpage but) to the project. --Walter 12:28, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I have added a link. - Pureblade  | Θ 01:42, 26 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi, Tirben
Hi, Pureblade, I don't understand this edit. Could you clarify what you mean, please? Thanks, Talrias (t | e | c) 18:00, 4 January 2006 (UTC)


 * I was making a subpage for voting on the flag. As soon as I get on my home computer, I would like to make a submission myself. - Pureblade  | Θ 18:14, 4 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The flag voting is done on Tirben's website, not on Wikipedia, and unfortunately it's too late to submit new flags at the current time - though of course you can propose a law to change the flag at a later date. :) Talrias (t | e | c) 18:20, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Community Justice
I am going on vacation for a week, so I'm making Ian13 acting chairman. Do you wish to be acting chief executive until next Sunday evening? I need a response by 0000GMT, or I shall leave the post vacant. Compu te  r  Jo  e 18:12, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Good luck, hopefully together we will manage to keep the project going. Ian13ID:540053 20:36, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Articles For Deletion
Hi, one or both of the following situations applies to you, and you may therefore be interested in related discussions.
 * You expressed an opinion about the proposed deletion of an article concerning one of the first 200 verses of the Gospel of Matthew. Would you therefore like to join a centralised discussion about the other 199 articles at Centralized discussion/200 verses of Matthew
 * You expressed an opinion about the proposed deletion of an article concerning one of the first 19 verses of the 20th Chapter of the Gospel of John. Would you therefore like to join a centralised discussion about the other 18 articles at Centralized discussion/Verses of John 20

You may also be interested in a discussion of whether or not the entire text of a whole bible chapter should be contained in the 6 articles concerning those specific chapters, and whether or not they should only use the translations favoured by fundamentalists. This is being discussed at Centralized discussion/Whole bible chapter text.

--Victim of signature fascism | Don't forget to vote in the Wikipedia Arbitration Committee elections 18:02, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

My User Talk Page
Hey, I want to take you up on your offer to help me with my User Page. Could you contact me? M@$+@ Ju 23:40, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Sorry I Missed Your Message
I was kind of busy today, but I hope we can arrange another time. You can E-Mail me at Mattman723@yahoo.com M@$+@ Ju 01:59, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

rollback tool
You're not an admin, so whatever script or tool you're using to perform rollbacks is seriously screwing up every single article you're using it on. It's replacing certain symbols. Stop using it immediately (and note, I didn't say "please fix it"). Rollback vandalism manually please. You're also responsible for fixing those errors on every page you've used that rollback tool on. -- Netoholic @ 05:40, 18 January 2006 (UTC)

Whole tax
Wow, we tagged that "nonsense" absolutely simultaneously. ;) --Deville 03:37, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I wonder how the guy that posted that is going to react when he shows that to 'Mr Palmer'. Ought to be entertaining. - Pureblade  | Θ 03:38, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * True, true... amazing what some of these new pages are. I roll through that list every once in a while, I do have to admit that some of those nonsense can be amusing...  --Deville 03:40, 19 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Adam grunin.... o_O? - Pureblade  | Θ 03:42, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

proposed policy
Hi, you recently commented on bible-verse articles, and may therefore be interested in commenting about a proposed policy covering roughly 50 specific verses:


 * Centralized discussion/Verses of 1 Kings 4 and 5

--Victim of signature fascism 20:17, 28 January 2006 (UTC)

An Esperanzial note
As I remember, the last spam that was handed out was on the 20th of December last year, so I think it's time for another update. First and foremost, the new Advisory Council and Administrator General have been elected. They consist of myself as Admin General and FireFox, Titoxd, Flcelloguy and Karmafist as the Advisory Council. We as a group met formally for the first time on the 31st of Decembe. The minutes of this meeting can be found at WP:ESP/ACM. The next one is planned for tonight (Sunday 29 January) at 20:30 UTC and the agenda can be found at WP:ESP/ACM2.

In other news, Karmafist has set up a discussion about a new personal attack policy, which it can be found here. Other new pages include an introductory page on what to do when you sign up, So you've joined Esperanza... and a welcome template: EA-welcome (courtesy of Bratsche). Some of our old hands may like to make sure they do everything on the list as well ;) Additionally, the userpage award program proposal has become official is operational: see Esperanza/User Page Award to nominate a userpage or volunteer as a judge. Also see the proposed programs page for many new proposals and old ones that need more discussion ;)

Other than that, I hope you all had a lovely Christmas and wish you an Esperanzially good new WikiYear :D Thank you! --Cel e stianpower háblame 16:57, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

Message delivered by Rune.welsh using AWB. If you wish to recieve no further messages of this ilk, please sign your name here.

Cleanup Taskforce
Can you glance at Paintball marker and render an opinion on whether it is ready to be closed? I'm undecided on whether it has lots of detail or too much trivia. Task force notes are at Cleanup Taskforce/Paintball marker. Thank you. RJFJR 00:43, 30 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you for looking at the article. I needed a second opinion.  I've closed it.  RJFJR 05:57, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Wikipediology election
Since you initiated the election, I don't believe it is appropriate for you to stand for Regent Ñ, but if you want to serve out the remainder of Maltmomma's term, it's yours.- JCarriker 05:02, 30 January 2006 (UTC)