User talk:Hari1008

March 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Free content, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Free content was changed by Hari1008 (u) (t) deleting 18060 characters on 2010-03-14T22:47:20+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:47, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vadtal gadi acharya parampara
A tag has been placed on Vadtal gadi acharya parampara requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. '' ▒ ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪  ▒  ―Œ  ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣  08:59, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Vadtal gadi acharya parampara
I have nominated Vadtal gadi acharya parampara, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Vadtal gadi acharya parampara. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. '' ▒ ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪  ▒  ―Œ  ♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣  13:07, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Vadtal gadi acharya parampara
A tag has been placed on Vadtal gadi acharya parampara requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 13:48, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Shri Laxmi Narayan Dev Vadtal Gadi Acharya Parampara
A tag has been placed on Shri Laxmi Narayan Dev Vadtal Gadi Acharya Parampara, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 23:47, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Warning
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. andy (talk) 23:46, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Your addition to Shri Laxmi Narayan Dev Vadtal Gadi Acharya Parampara has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Copied from http://www.swaminarayanvadtalgadi.org/acharyas/ Whpq (talk) 01:35, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: Deleted Article : Shri Laxmi Narayan Dev Vadtal Gadi Acharya Parampara
Re your message: The article was deleted because it was a copyright violation. If you would like to donate copyrighted material from your website to Wikipedia, please see Donating copyrighted materials. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:42, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

About your deleted article(s)
You left a note on my talk page, and I would normally answer there, but in this case, with other editors having taken action, it makes more sense to reply here. You've indicated that the website which this material is copied from is your own material. It was deleted because we have no way of knowing that. If you wish to donate the material to Wikipedia, you may do so following the procedure at Donating copyrighted materials. However, I will caution you that this is no guarantee that the material will be accepted. Some issues that would need to be considered are:
 * Conflict of interest - as you have some relationship to the subject
 * Verifiability - as the article would need sourcing
 * What Wikipedia is not - as replicating your website does not make for an encyclopedia article

You may want to make use of the Article wizard which is meant to guide you through the creation of an article. -- Whpq (talk) 21:53, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of How to donate copyrighted materials
A tag has been placed on How to donate copyrighted materials, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Bonewah (talk) 20:47, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for wanton and willful disregard for our copyright policy. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Blueboy96 21:45, 23 March 2010 (UTC)