User talk:Hari Krishna Valiveti

Hello, I'm Torreslfchero. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added, because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you.

December 2012
Hello, I'm Raghusri. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Sarocharu because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ''Because i have moved to and modified it in Critical reception section. Don't add again to References section.'' Raghusri 10:27, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Sarocharu. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Raghusri 10:46, 25 December 2012 (UTC)

January 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Seethamma Vakitlo Sirimalle Chettu, you may be blocked from editing. ''Because already your edits have been reverted by an expereinced editor. And you are doing the same wrong thing again. As Krzna told you, it's not the proper way to add there. Add your citations to the particluar sections in the article, so that they will be automatically displayed in References section.'' Raghusri 12:03, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

Discussion notice
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. krZna (talk) 22:19, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Block
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for adding spam links. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia and potentially penalized by search engines. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen &#124; talk 01:14, 11 January 2013 (UTC).

Srikanth Shatruvu
Hello ,

It seems to me that an article you worked on, Srikanth Shatruvu, may have something copied from http://articles.timesofindia.indiatimes.com/2012-07-07/news-interviews/32577221_1_new-movie-film-nanakramguda. It's entirely possible that I made a mistake, but I wanted to let you know because Wikipedia is strict about copying from other sites.

It's important that you edit the article and rewrite it in your own words, unless you're absolutely certain nothing in it is copied. If you're not sure how to fix the problem or have any questions, there are people at the help desk who are happy to assist you.

Thank you for helping build a free encyclopedia! MadmanBot (talk) 11:44, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Srikanth Shatruvu


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Srikanth Shatruvu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Gfosankar (talk) 12:10, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Putukku Jara Jara Dubukku Me


A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Putukku Jara Jara Dubukku Me requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that your page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. 19:18, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Indian Vegetables - Chilles .jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Indian Vegetables - Chilles .jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.  Ron h jones  (Talk) 22:26, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
This is your last warning. The next time you insert a spam link, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. DMacks (talk) 21:27, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. DMacks (talk) 17:44, 11 June 2013 (UTC)