User talk:Haridash92

May 2024
Hello Haridash92. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Bharti Kamdi, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Haridash92. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. —asparagusus  (interaction)  sprouts!  22:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)


 * I am not paid for these edits.
 * Edits made by me are completely voluntary and pro bono in the nature.
 * Thanks 103.142.11.24 (talk) 22:06, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I am not paid for these edits.
 * Edits made by me are completely voluntary and pro bono in the nature.
 * Thanks Haridash92 (talk) 22:12, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Bharti Kamdi moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Bharti Kamdi, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 09:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


 * @Maliner
 * Please remove the part of the article Bharti Kamdi, which you do not see fit.
 * I will cite more resources later.
 * Removing entire article amounts to the gagging of the information. Haridash92 (talk) 09:27, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * she fails WP:N, so unless she is notable she will not have her own article. Maliner (talk) 09:28, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * @Maliner
 * Here's the important affidavit citation from the official website of election commission of India conclusive of the candidature for the member of parliament in the coming indian general election 2024.
 * [] Haridash92 (talk) 09:37, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * affidavit citation from the official website of election commission of India Haridash92 (talk) 09:41, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * That's not enough. Please read NPOL. Maliner (talk) 09:55, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Also please log in while editing. Editing both with an IP and an account is usually not allowed here. Maliner (talk) 09:56, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Bharti Bharat Kamdi
Hello Haridash92, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Bharti Bharat Kamdi, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Bharti Bharat Kamdi.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 22:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)


 * @Vanderwaalforces
 * This women has served as Chairperson of the Zilla Parishad of entire Palghar district.
 * It alone serves the use case for the Notability. Haridash92 (talk) 15:07, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Bharti-Bharat-Kamdi
Hello Haridash92, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Bharti-Bharat-Kamdi, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Bharti-Bharat-Kamdi.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with. And don't forget to sign your reply with. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 20:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)