User talk:Harihara19091965

February 2019
Hello, I'm Wiki KuthiVaiyans. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Viswasam, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wiki KuthiVaiyans (talk) 08:20, 10 February 2019 (UTC) Hi kuthadi kuthiyans. I have posted a valid reliable source for Viswasam collections, You seem to reduce collections for Viswasam, I have written what majority websites say as collection for Viswasam. Thank you

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Viswasam. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Wiki KuthiVaiyans (talk) 09:19, 10 February 2019 (UTC) Dear brother, firstly I want to say that the collections which you have updated is a mistake. When majority of Reputed sources say #Viswasam crossed 180 crores long ago, 170 crores seems like you are giving discount. Secondly, i m editing based on information from National reputed medias like India today, If u want area wise break up for #Viswasam also , I am ready to provide you. KINDLY dont make any changes here after. I am editing it only based on authentic sources. Ib times is not a authentic box office source, it only updates news which other trackers say , moreover it has not revealed exact Viswasam collection as of now. Once again thank you.


 * As I said before in the talk page, IB times figure is the recent one and IB times is considered reliable like any other mainstream media and the source you are providing is just a prediction, So stop making changes until you have a recent reliable source for your claim. Wiki KuthiVaiyans (talk) 09:59, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did on Viswasam. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Wiki KuthiVaiyans (talk) 10:00, 10 February 2019 (UTC) Ib times is not a reliable source, Souces like india today have said #Viswasam grossed 180 crores brother , but you dont seem to look at that .Moreover , Ib times hasnt exactly revealed collection of Viswasam. Its a prediction by Reputed India today, if anything is incorrect , I will make a change .Thank You. Dear brother, You have to look at what majoriy reputed sources say. Ib times hasnt even revealed exact collection, ib times is a website which just shares reports of other websites/trackers , I am astonished that you are'nt aware of this. In case, if reputed medias update diffrent collection , I will be first one to change this collection , until then Kindly dont edit this. Thank You.


 * Read WP:RS, recent source should be used and IB times is reliable as India today and actually In this matter India today is one who is just circular reporting a tracker's tweet like most source. Wiki KuthiVaiyans (talk) 10:16, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Wiki KuthiVaiyans (talk) 10:17, 10 February 2019 (UTC) NOT AT ALL FAIR BROTHER. It seems like you want to despirately reduce #Viswasam collections. IB TIMES clearly mentioned that according to trackers- he himself gets figures from trackers only, that it has crossed 170 crores. Ib times itself is not a box office website. I am only posting what India today has written, I DONT find anything wrong in that. IF any reputed website further changes, then i will edit the collection. Until then, dont change this brother. Thank you. I have majority reputed websites in my side to prove my claim, My friend is too a extended confirmed user , If you keep wantedely reducing Viswasam collections. I will too keep posting correct figures, I have proofs of reputed websites also. THANK YOU BROTHER WHY WAS I BLOCKED ? I Posted what majority reputed medias said about VISWASAM, i have proof also for that. I kindly request to be unblocked, this is not at all fair. Kindly unblock me, i will not take this lightly. THANK YOU. You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31h for WP:3RR. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. User:Ymblanter (talk) 11:56, 10 February 2019 (UTC) WHY WAS I BLOCKED ? I Posted what majority reputed medias said about VISWASAM, i have proof also for that. I kindly request to be unblocked, this is not at all fair. Kindly unblock me, i will not take this lightly. THANK YOU.
 * You were blocked because you overstepped three reverts within 24h, see WP:3RR. If you want to be unblocked you need to post an unblock request as detailed in the template above.--Ymblanter (talk) 11:26, 10 February 2019 (UTC)


 * I've properly formatted your request, your explanation should replace the "your reason here" text in the block notice. Someone else will review this- but it doesn't matter why you were reverting.  Everyone in an edit war thinks they are correct, that is not a defense.  You will need to do as I asked above. 331dot (talk) 12:21, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

To the next reviewing admin, please consider extending the block. --Yamla (talk) 21:49, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

"You will not be able to edit here again until you post an unblock appeal that shows you have understood what edit-warring is, why it is problematic, and how to avoid it in future." Your unblock request doesn't address these points. Explain edit-warring in your own words, explain why your edits were a problem, and tell us exactly how you'd avoid it in the future. At this point, you probably only get one more chance before losing access to this talk page, so think carefully. --Yamla (talk) 19:59, 11 February 2019 (UTC)