User talk:Harisaii

March 2017
Hello, I'm Peaceray. An edit that you recently made to Howard Markel seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want more practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Peaceray (talk) 23:26, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of NCDcenter.com for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NCDcenter.com is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/NCDcenter.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Theroadislong (talk) 11:01, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Harisaii, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with this edit to NCDcenter.com. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   21:33, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Please stop removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages as you did with this edit to NCDcenter.com. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   00:46, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Safoller Pothe


The article Safoller Pothe has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * NN book by NN author. Three of the four cited sources appear to be press releases. The review in New Age is insufficient on its own to meet WP:NBOOK. Searches of the usual Google types, EBSCO, HighBeam, JSTOR and ProQuest found nothing else.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Worldbruce (talk) 18:40, 10 June 2017 (UTC)