User talk:Harishrawat11/DRAFT

Analyzing article
At the request of User:Harishrawat11 I have taken a look at this draft article. I started by looking at the references and the results were not encouraging. I deleted three or four that were not acceptable as references (such as links to other Wikipedia articles) or that did not appear to mention the subject. The remaining references are as follows:


 * 1) confirms appointment to Telecom Regulation Authority
 * 2) The Hindu (a Reliable Source) ditto
 * 3) is Significant coverage but not a Reliable (or possibly Independent) source
 * 4) merely cites the book
 * 5) huge list of topics; if it mentions the subject, I couldn't find it; and in any case not Significant coverage
 * 6) is not independent
 * 7) (a Reliable Source) confirms his job title.
 * 8) (a Reliable Source) mentions him briefly in an article about something else.
 * 9) (a Reliable Source) quotes him as TRAI adviser
 * 10) (a Reliable Source) quotes him as TRAI adviser
 * 11) identical to #10
 * 12) long list of officers, adds nothing to article
 * 13) I was unable to find any mention of the subject
 * 14) same link as #12

Unfortunately these do not add up to significant coverage by independent reliable sources in my opinion. They serve to confirm his titles with the government but that's about all. Evidence of notability is lacking. --MelanieN (talk) 16:29, 9 November 2012 (UTC)