User talk:Harlem Baker Hughes/January - February 2013

Category:African-American female Crunk&#38;B musicians
Category:African-American female Crunk&, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Secret account 15:41, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited PL3DGE, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Diddy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:28, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cascade Investment, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Conglomerate (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 29
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Nas Is Like (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Hot97


 * Raanan Gissin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Louis Brandeis Award

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

User:117.202.91.43
I've reported to Administrator intervention against vandalism. Peter&#160;James (talk) 18:51, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Ty, give User:117.202.91.43 a hard block.Harlem Baker Hughes (talk) 18:52, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * That IP is already reported and I hope it will be blocked soon. Torreslfchero (talk) 18:55, 4 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Generally, reports such as Sockpuppet investigations/117.202.91.43 are unnecessary for simple vandalism, particularly if the vandal isn't using registered accounts. It is simpler and more efficient to report them to WP:AIV instead. Best ​—DoRD (talk)​ 19:36, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up and advice Harlem Baker Hughes (talk) 19:38, 4 February 2013 (UTC)


 * Also, don't worry about re-adding "you've been blocked" notices to a blocked user's talk page - they are allowed to remove them, under WP:BLANKING. Just ignore them if they do this, as it doesn't matter.  Regards, BencherliteTalk 19:56, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Got it.Harlem Baker Hughes (talk) 19:57, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Level 4 warnings
Hi there. I've been noticing that you're being fairly liberal with your use of level 4 warnings. I didn't think a message was necessary, but this was just over the top. I'd recommend just sticking to the normal pattern of escalating warnings rather than jumping straight to level 4. Also, remember that 4-im ("only") warnings should be used for severe abuses and defamation only. But overall keep up the good work! Thanks,  Swarm   X 20:14, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

k, I'll keep the normal pattern of escalating warnings in mind, when I issue warnings.Harlem Baker Hughes (talk) 20:15, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Fleetwood Mac
You accused me of vandalism in your edit comment on Fleetwood Mac. That is not only rude, but a personal attack, not to mention false. Please reconsider your habits. --91.10.59.85 (talk) 00:36, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

My apologies as I didn't initially see that you were removing comments adhering to WP:MOS. I initially took your edit as vandalism since I saw referenced material being blanked or removed and didn't realize that the IP was removing a comment which breaks WP:MOS on Fleetwood Mac, which you placed in an edit summary after my reverted edits.Harlem Baker Hughes (talk) 00:42, 5 February 2013 (UTC)


 * WP:AGF next time. --91.10.59.85 (talk) 00:49, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Got it.00:49, 5 February 2013 (UTC).Harlem Baker Hughes (talk) 00:50, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Sure ?
Are you sure this is vandalism ? Grant there should be an edit summary explaining the edit but, I'm not sure it's vandalism. Mlpearc ( powwow ) 00:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

See message on your talk page.Harlem Baker Hughes (talk) 00:43, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Tom Lee Music
Hi there! I'm an administrator of Tom Lee Music Co.. We've noticed that some of the information placed on our page has been sourced from the Hong Kong tabloid newspaper "Apple Daily". As tabloids can be an unreliable source of information, may we request an edit to remove all content sourced from "Apple Daily"? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.49.110.113 (talk) 00:38, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

I only eradicate vandalism on Wikipedia. I'm not that punctilious when it comes to removing material, especially sourced material. I had no responsibility for the addition of these tabloids on your page. I'm not sure which ones you are pointing out as they seem to point to sourced Hong Kong tabloids.Harlem Baker Hughes (talk) 00:46, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Question.
I thought that most album pages featured a ratings section. The one that I added the rating too did not. Isn't a rating a legitimate thing to edit? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.121.218.6 (talk) 00:58, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

According to your edits, you add ratings based on your brothers point of view. Wikipedia only accepts legitimate ratings based on a reliable and well know sources such as from a well known newspaper column, magazine, or a highly reputed review site and not the inclusion of ratings based on the opinion of your brother's personal music review blog.Harlem Baker Hughes (talk) 01:02, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Athens High School (Troy, Michigan), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Gtwfan52 (talk) 02:23, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

I never added defamatory content to Athens High School (Troy, Michigan), it was an edit made by 69.14.57.28 which I accidentally mistook as vandalism. Blame 69.14.58.198 for adding it in the first place as I'll be more careful next time when reverting vandalism.Harlem Baker Hughes (talk) 02:25, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
 * My apologies. Gtwfan52 (talk) 02:46, 5 February 2013 (UTC)