User talk:Harleyro

September 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Alabama Crimson Tide football. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. If you are engaged in an article content dispute use the article's talk page to discuss the issue(s). Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -Fnlayson (talk) 20:11, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  20:24, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  20:31, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * I have also hard-blocked your IP address because you used that address and this account to engage in sockpuppetry.

I am adding Official NCAA sources to all teams for National Championships for football. Fnlayson keeps reverting and deleting me official NCAA Source for National Championships http://www.ncaa.com/history/football/fbs that State Alabama Did not win nationla CHampionships in 1934 and in 1941, is was actually Minnesota. I also removed on Minnesota's Page the fact that they claim 7 national Championships, when they are only creditied by the NCAA with have 6. If we are going to block people for telling the truth, then so be it, however, it is easier to make sure a source is official and can be used, than it is to lie and tell what you want to hear on a wikipedia article. I already applied for the dispute resolution, but if one keeps putting incorrect data, then that one should be blocked until the data they are claiming is proven to be true or false. Also, when one goes to college, and is moving around to different classes, their ip will tend to change. This also comes from being verifiable source, which the NCAA is a Verifiable Source, where as Alabama Crimson Tide Page is not. Teams in college are Governed by the NCAA, so it makes the NCAA the official record keepers. Furthermore, it is a published source, therefore it is still a valid edit, cause as long as you have internet, you can get to the official NCAA website.Furthermore it is from a reliable source.

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  20:47, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * "I also removed on Minnesota's Page the fact that they claim 7 national Championships" - Which article are you referring to? Also, could you supply a link to where you say that you filed for dispute resolution? You have been blocked for your behavior..edit-warring and switching between an IP and a named account to edit war is sockpuppetry which is not allowed.

Also i had never ever registered for wikipedia before, so i started an account, which is why it went from an IP to a user name, and here is the article, and it never saved on my end. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Minnesota_Golden_Gophers_football. Minnesota According to the NCAA doesn't have a national Championship in 1904, it went to Michigan and Pennsylvania. Ill find the dispute link when I can. The dispute is not submitted, and there is no info on the talk page.

Unfortunately, this is why wikipedia will never become a credible source for anything. We let people put what every they believe to be true, but not what is actually true. However, it seems that we would rather believe the lies, then look into the truth. It's the downfall of the community as a whole, I won't edit anything again, as it appears to be a waste of time, but I will be sure to make sure everyone knows how bad a source wikipedia is as the administrators let lies go all over the community. Also there was no good suggestion, just letting you know.
 * If you resume edit warring when your block expires, your next block will be for a longer duration, just letting you know. OhNo itsJamie Talk 14:12, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

I won't edit anything again, as it appears to be a waste of time, I won't edit anything again, as it appears to be a waste of time, I won't edit anything again, as it appears to be a waste of time, Please read what I had said.


 * You've been sidelined for 48 hours because of your behavior not because of the argument(s) you are trying to make. If those arguments have veracity then you discuss them on the article's talk page with other editors and form consensus. You cannot defend edit-warring behavior because you want to right great wrongs. Learn how to behave within policies and guidelines so that you don't let your conduct stand in your way.

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  15:21, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Btw, new accounts rarely start pining about the downfall of the Wikipedia community and all of the dastardly admins, etc. etc. That implies that you aren't all that new and uninitiated to WP. You know edit warring is wrong.