User talk:Harlie40hands/sandbox

==10/14/2018 Evaluation byGracelorelei (talk) 19:36, 14 October 2018 (UTC)

Score:41.5/40 Spelling/Grammar Meets Expectations

Language exceeds expectations, very well written

Organization exceeds expectations, very well organized and formatted, and developed

Coding meets expectations

Validity Meets expecattions, everything is cited and there are internal links to things mentioned in paragraph Completion Meets expectations

Relevance Meets expectations: Everything seems to add to the paragraph, and developes the subject

Sources exceeds expectaions have 4 sources

Citations Meets Expectations, you have more citations then required and used them all

References meets expectations.

Athens Evaluation; 12/6/2018 Evaluation by Austin Xi
Austinxi (talk) 20:31, 6 December 2018 (UTC)

Spelling/Grammar
Exceeds Expectations I didn't see any spelling or grammatical errors.

Language
Exceeds Expectations I found the wording to be not too formal and not too casual which is a good mixture for a school assignment about culture and art

Organization
Exceeds Expectation The beginning was a good introduction into the main idea of the economic crisis and leading into art and its relationship with the crisis in Athens.

Coding
Meets Expectations Seems to work great

Validity
Meets Expectations Journals, newspapers, library sources-- all valid sources to draw information from.

Completion
Meets Expectation Has the right amount of content and references.

Relevance
Meets Expectations Everything was about your subject and stayed on topic

Spelling/Grammar
Exceeds expectations.

Language
Exceeds expectations. Well worded.

Organization
Meets expectations.

Coding
Meets expectations.

Validity
Meets expectations. Very solid information.

Completeness
Meets expectations.

Relevance
Meets expectations. Useful information.

Spelling/Grammar
Meets Expectations

Language
Meets Expectations Very well laid out. This is clear and has a wealth of information.

Organization
Meets Expectations Organized in a clear and easy to follow manner.

Coding
Exceeds Expectations Excellent coding with many links.

Validity
Meets Expectations

Completion
Exceeds Expectations Lots of information and multiple paragraphs.

Relevance
Meets Expectations

Spelling/Grammar
Meets Expectations I would suggest combining sentence 1 and 2 in the Acoustics Function section. I would suggest removing "Because" in the next sentence. It might help with the flow.

Language
Meets Expectations

Organization
Meets Expectations I like the added section -- Acoustic Function. It has been discussed extensively that Gaudi had very specific intentions involved with the layout and design of Sagrada Familia. That being said, as a viewer, some more information about the bells and their function/design intention would be great.

Coding
Meets Expectations

Validity
Exceeds Expectations Decent information.

Completion
Meets Expectations Finding citation for existing article added to completion of the whole article! Some more info about the bells would help to fill out added section a bit.

Relevance
Exceeds Expectations I feel this information to be relevant and interesting. Good addition to the article.

Spelling/Grammar
Meets Expectations Spelling looks good. Remember to capitalize Arabia and Arabic.

Language
Meets Expectations The language is in keeping with the article standards.

Organization
Exceeds Expectations Your article addition is well laid out with clear and bolded topic titles.

Coding
Nearly Meets Expectations Consider adding a link or two to outside articles.

Validity
Meets Expectations The information is valid to the city's history.

Completion
Meets Expectations You have written enough for the assignment.

Relevance
Meets Expectations Relevant information for the greater article.

Spelling/Grammar
Meets standard Good, except Arabia in the Opera section should probably be capitalized. Your sentences are set up great, though.

Language
Meets standard Very formal choice of words. You did well in not voicing personal opinion, instead stating what was fact. Good job!

Organization
Nearly meets standard. The organization at the end is done well, but perhaps you could attempt to add sections to the upper portion of your article?

Coding
Meets standard No code errors that I could find, however I would include wiki links to various topics that you mention, i.e you could link to the wikipedia page of Seville and Mozart in the Opera section, and Athens and Germany in the beginning paragraphs.

Validity
Meets standard It all seems like solid information.

Completion
Nearly meets standard As I mentioned above, a little tweaking here and there throughout the article would generate a solid article! Additionally, consider adding some images, they help wiki articles pop out more.

Relevance
Exeeds standard You included exactly what you intended, and all of the information seemed relevant to the subject.

Evaluation December 6th by Gracelorelei (talk) 23:34, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
Spelling/Grammar Meets standard: Nothing wrong stood out, and everything seemed correct

Language Meets standard: You have a very good voice when writing and you have impeccable vocabulary, well done

Organization Nearly meets standard: You did really good with breaking up the paragraphs and at the end you have titles for each paragraph, but the beginning of the article could use some titles and a little more organizations because its just a large portion of the edit

Coding Meets standard I didnt see anything that was done incorrectly but I would add in wiki links to the paragraphs to give the reader insight and background. Think of it like the reader has never heard of anything youre talking about and hyperlink cities, organizations and anything that has a wiki page.

Validity Meets standards, well done everything is backed up and cited

Completion Meets standards: You have completed everything and have more than enough info and citations, but the article could use the hyperlinks like I mentioned and maybe some photos or charts to add to the page! Just a suggestion.

Relevance Exeeds standard Everything you wrote and included added to your page beautifully and gave the reader great information about the topic

Sources Exceeds standards: Youy have 30 reputable sources! Very well done I am impressed. I would fix some of the links to your sources though, they lead to a PSU proxy link and you can fix that by copying the DOI URL straight from the journal or PDF of the journal it should be located at the top of the journal !!

Citations Meets standard your citations are all there and cited correctly well done

References Meets standard Everything looks good! But I am wondering what sources 7/8 and 9/10 are and if they can be broken up to not be cited right next to each other. That may have been on ourpose though!

Gracelorelei (talk) 23:34, 6 December 2018 (UTC)