User talk:Harm Witteveen

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on, or ask your question and then place  before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! HenkvD 18:17, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Nomination of Toos van Holstein for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Toos van Holstein is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Toos van Holstein until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 03:49, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Unsourced additions to Toos van Holstein
Hello: just a note to say that I reverted some of your additions to the article on Toos van Holstein. If you dig into the welcome notice above, you will see that everything in Wikipedia needs to be verifiable by independent sources who have written about the person. That is how we establish notability. You are welcome to add material to the article, but it must be accompanied by sources from independently published reliable publications. Saying that she has accomplished something without providing a reliable independent source is of not value here-- it has to be proven by a source. To quote the verifiability page, Wikiepdia's "content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of its editors."ThatMontrealIP (talk) 04:11, 15 January 2019 (UTC)