User talk:Harold3

September 2007
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Raymond arritt. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.  Sp art an- Ja mes  18:17, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User:Raymond arritt, you will be blocked from editing. AngelOfSadness talk  18:19, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Then tell Raymond arritt to stop deleteing my page.

This is your last warning. The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- Finngall  talk  18:29, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

This page is not an "inappropriate page"!! My website has been since 1990 and is well knowen.


 * You may wish to read WP:N to see why we do not feel we can currently have an article on it. --John 18:38, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

'''AGAIN: STOP DELETING MY PAGE !! IT IS NOT INAPPROPRIATE, IT IS NOT NONSENSE I WILL KEEP ON RECREATING IT UNTILL YOU STOP DELETING IT !!

MY WEBSITE HAS BEE UP SINCE 1990, GO READ IT !!'''


 * I have ensured it cannot be recreated. Your attitude is unacceptable. If you continue to break our rules you will be blocked from editing. --John 18:43, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

AGAIN.. You are being very rude.. If you want to get nasty about this, I will sue you all? How is that?

Your recent edits to User talk:Harold3 could give editors of Wikipedia the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that this is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a genuine dispute with the Community or its members, please use dispute resolution. B1atv 19:15, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Then UN-BLOCK all editing of The Federatioon Of Earth if you wish not to have legal action.. Put it simply.. You are denying me the right of FREE SPEECH. The Federation Of Earth article was in no way inappropriate, nor was in anyway nonsense.. The Federation Of Earth has been around since 1981 and formally created on November 15, 2001. Our website has been up since 1997 and we certainly have a lot of support of which I can bring on here to counter your claims of non-sense and inappropiateness. If I were to sue, I am sure our lawyers and the ACLU will be more than happy to take the case up.

Harold-3, President of The Federation Of Earth.

Your recent edits could give editors of Wikipedia the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that this is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a genuine dispute with the Community or its members, please use dispute resolution. ''THIS IS NON NEGOTIABLE. DO NOT MAKE LEGAL THREATS ON WIKIPEDIA. THAT IS WIKIPEDIA POLICY. There is no such thing as free speech on wikipedia. Articles which do not confirm to WP policy do not get created. If they are they are deleted. End of story.'' B1atv 19:38, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

I JUST CONTACTED THE WIKIPEDIA MAIN OFFICE ABOUT YOUR BLATENT DELETETING OF MY ARTICE AND BLOCKING THE EDITING OF MY PAGE. I WILL PUT A STOP TO YOUR ACTION. SUGGESTION.. UNBLOCK ALL MY PAGES NOW.

Speedy deletion of Talk:The Federal Republic Of The Federation Of Earth
A tag has been placed on Talk:The Federal Republic Of The Federation Of Earth, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD g1.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. B1atv 21:15, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Ridiculous threats
Please don't make ridiculous claims in order to attempt to threaten other editors into leaving your article undeleted even though it violates the notability criteria. It doesn't strengthen your argument; it only makes you look foolish. If your web site is really important, one of your many readers will create an article about it which includes sources to verify notability. -FisherQueen (Talk) 21:18, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below.