User talk:HaroldErica

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, HaroldErica, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! VQuakr (talk) 03:08, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

Welcome
I see you have an interest in the hedge fund industry, that's great. I look forward to working together. Cheers! -- — Keithbob • Talk  • 13:00, 30 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi Keithbob, yes I've been cleaning up citations on these hedge fund pages. Thanks for contacting me, it's my first inter Wikipedia communication, is it called a discussion or is that something else? How do we work together work? (This is all very new to me). Thanks HaroldErica (talk) 21:44, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi HaroldErica, yes this is talk page discussion vs. article page discussion. On your User Page here we can discuss general topics about either of us as editors. For discussions on article topics we will use that articles "discussion" or "talk" page. Let me know if you need help with something by leaving a message on my talk page.  It appears the hedge fund articles really could use some clean up and development. Your help is really appreciated. Cheers! -- — Keithbob •  Talk  • 13:32, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of BlueCrest Capital Management


A tag has been placed on BlueCrest Capital Management requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cind.  amuse  (Cindy) 05:31, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of York Capital Management


A tag has been placed on York Capital Management requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Cind.  amuse  (Cindy) 05:37, 5 August 2011 (UTC)


 * Re the above two and Lansdowne Partners: creating stubs is pointless. Please take your time. Create one, properly referenced article at a time. &mdash; RHaworth  09:10, 5 August 2011 (UTC)

Bridgewater Associates
Hi Harold, I've been spending some time developing the Bridgewater Associates article over the past month or so but I'm getting cross eyed. If you have a chance, could you take a look at it and see if you can find any thing that needs correcting? thanks muchly, -- — Keithbob •  Talk  • 04:15, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Hey Keithbob, sure. Might take me some time. But i'll take a look at it. HaroldErica (talk) 13:55, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Winton Capital
Hello HaroldErica, a few weeks ago you created a new article about the British investment management firm Winton Capital Management. Following that, it so happens that someone from Winton asked me to see if I could continue to improve it, so I've now posted a much more complete version in my user space (see here) and posted a request on the Winton Talk page (see here). I'm not sure if you're still active on Wikipedia, but if so I'd like to get your feedback and perhaps your agreement to update it with my new version. Let me know what you think. Cheers, WWB Too (talk) 22:07, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)