User talk:Harpen47

Your submission at Articles for creation
 Servicizing, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! Citrusbowler (talk) (contribs) (email me)  21:59, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Conflict of interest and Servicizing
Hello, Harpen47. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Servicizing, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.

Thank you for submitting this through WP:Articles for creation ("AFC"). It is perfectly acceptable for an editor who has a conflict of interest to submit articles through AFC. In fact, it is preferred that even experienced editors submit articles this way if they have a conflict of interest.

Now that the article has been created, you should not make substantial edits to it if you have a conflict of interest. See Conflict of interest for guidelines on what you may and may not do if you have a conflict of interest.

I am basing my claim of a conflict of interest on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_permissions/Confirmed&diff=prev&oldid=556399214 this edit] by where he claims a close connection to the topic and a desire to upload an article about servicizing and by the block/unblock discussion above [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Harpen47&oldid=556567209 archive].

If you are NOT connected with SPREE, please reply here, delete the line from Talk:Servicizing, accept my sincere apologies. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)/(e-mail)  18:41, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Servicizing for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Servicizing is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Servicizing until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 06:16, 1 February 2014 (UTC)