User talk:Harriscj

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia!

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type   on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 17:51, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Welcome!
Hello, Harriscj, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:37, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Climate change
Hi - I received a notification that you were editing the article on climate change. It looks like your edits were reverted by and I wanted to explain why this happened.

The main reasons for this are ultimately ones of tone and sourcing. The sourcing was the main reason given by Coldcreation for the removal, as you didn't include any sourcing that would back up the claims made in your additions. It looks like you mentioned sourcing, however the citations need to be in-line so people can verify the content. This is incredibly important with articles, but especially ones that are prone to controversy such as climate change. What this means is that when you add to an article like this, you need to make sure that the content is sourced and with the best possible sourcing you can find. Academic and scholarly sources are a good example of what is usually considered to be a "best possible source" for articles like this. Another issue with the article, however, was one of tone as the content was written like a persuasive essay where the intent is to get the reader to see things a specific way. With topics like this you need to make sure that the material is neutrally written and doesn't contain any original research, as this will also lead to content getting removed from an article.

I hope that this helps explain the content's removal! Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 14:44, 20 December 2017 (UTC)