User talk:Harrisjamil

Welcome!
Hello, Harrisjamil, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to  The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! SPF121188 (talk this way) (my edits) 17:59, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024
Your recent edit(s) to Hina Pervaiz Butt has been reverted due to the inclusion of original research, which violates Wikipedia's policies. Please refrain from adding original research to articles in the future and ensure that all contributions are supported by reliable sources. This helps ensure the accuracy and reliability of Wikipedia content. Thank you. — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 18:03, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Hina Pervaiz Butt. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. SPF121188 (talk this way) (my edits) 18:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Hina Pervaiz Butt. — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 18:12, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Hello Harrisjamil. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Hina Pervaiz Butt, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Harrisjamil. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 18:16, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * +923312629038
 * Contact me i need to talk you. Harrisjamil (talk) 18:18, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * No, I'm not interested in having a private conversation. You can discuss things here. Also If you keep throwing in WP:OR, you might get blocked soon. — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 18:25, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * , please read the link that placed in their message. Original research on a biography of a living person is a big no-no, and we don't want to see you get blocked if you can provide constructive edits to WP.  SPF121188  (talk this way) (my edits) 18:32, 17 July 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi ,
 * Suggest me how do i add this further information in this wikipedia Harrisjamil (talk) 06:14, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
 * You should only include information that is verifiable and is not original research. — Saqib  ( talk  I  contribs ) 18:33, 20 July 2024 (UTC)