User talk:Harrison49/Archive 3

RAF Uxbridge at FAC
Best of luck with that, I think it stands a very good chance of getting through. I thought I recognised it, and then I remembered that I did the GA review for Hillingdon House. I may comment at the review later, but in the meantime if there's anything you think I might be able to help with just give me a shout. Malleus Fatuorum 22:13, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Because of the cock-up over having two FACs open at the same time User:SandyGeorgia has deleted both. Normally that would mean you couldn't renominate either for another two weeks, but I think if you ask her nicely she may relent in this case and let you put RAF Uxbridge back up again. As I said, I think RAF Uxbridge has a good chance of getting through, but I think Ickenham still needs some work. Malleus Fatuorum 16:56, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Agreed with that, her edit summary was "withdrawn, may be db-g6's after nominator acknowledges" ... which suggests she's looking for some acknowledgment that you know what's going on here. Ask her if you can re-instate Uxbridge. - Dank (push to talk) 18:19, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Per WT:Featured_article_candidates, I recommend you let Sandy know that you're fine with withdrawing it for now, and you'll be back 2 weeks after Ickenham was archived (i.e. not promoted). - Dank (push to talk) 16:15, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, and to be clear, you only have to wait two weeks from Sandy's timestamp on Ickenham where she said it wasn't promoted, at 11:55 on 25 October. - Dank (push to talk) 18:07, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVII, September 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please go to this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 02:14, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Service Prosecuting Authority
Hi, sadly File:MinistryofDefence.svg isn't my own work, I only uploaded the file. However, I had my own version of the MoD logo (File:MoD.svg), which I edited for you;

I'm sorry it isn't as detailed as the actual logo, but i'm sure you'll respect the fact that i cannot breach Crown Copyright©. Either way, I hope you like the logo, and I thank you for your request; Geord0 (talk) 16:04, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

GOCE drive newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 01:12, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Haydon Hall
The DYK project (nominate) 12:04, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

The Chimes, Uxbridge
The "copied" template just mentions that text was copied, and provides a link to the source article. It doesn't say all of the text was copied, but there was enough for attribution to be required and it wasn't linked in the edit summary when the page was created. Peter E. James (talk) 00:07, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

DYK nomination of The Chimes, Uxbridge
Hello! Your submission of The Chimes, Uxbridge at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Daemonic Kangaroo (talk) 07:42, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

MILHIST Military Aviation Questionaire
Hi Harrison49! As your MILHIST Military Avation Task Force coordinator, I'd like to conduct a short questionaire to give me an idea of what you would the task force to achieve and the capabilities of yours that might contribute positively to the task force. The four questions of this questionaire are:
 * 1) What are your strengths on Wikipedia?
 * 2) Which four military aviation articles would you like to see be promoted to at least GA?
 * 3) What detailed resources (books, journals, etc) about military aviation do you have access to? Please provide the publications' authors, titles and ISSNs/ISBNs.
 * 4) Which three military aviation articles are you wiling to provide assistance? This can be expansion, copyediting, reference formatting, etc.

Please reply by copying and pasting the following at User talk:Sp33dyphil and filling it out.
 * 1) My strengths
 * 2) Articles I'd like to see the task force improve
 * 3) Sources which I have
 * 4) Articles I'm willing to provide assistance
 * 1) Sources which I have
 * 2) Articles I'm willing to provide assistance
 * 1) Sources which I have
 * 2) Articles I'm willing to provide assistance
 * 1) Articles I'm willing to provide assistance
 * 1) Articles I'm willing to provide assistance
 * 1) Articles I'm willing to provide assistance

Thank you for your assistance. Regards --Sp33dyphil © • © 09:26, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Battle of Britain House
Orlady (talk) 17:01, 27 November 2011 (UTC) 02:24, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXVIII, October 2011
To receive this newsletter on your talk page, join the project or sign up here. If you are a member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. EdwardsBot (talk) 08:13, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Highgrove House, Eastcote
Hi Harrison49, sorry about the quick pass of Highgrove House, Eastcote. It has been my past experience that for articles needing to add more content, it usually takes some time, especially if may require additional sources. I was not sure if you would be able to complete it in the near future. I'm not sure how to reopen a closed review – if you know how you are welcome too, but it might be easier to re-nominate it (and don't worry, I'm not all in it to get ahead in the drive; I would only count this as one review). Best of luck. --Tea with toast (話)  16:06, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Opened nomination
I opened the nomination again. Sorry. SL93 (talk) 23:27, 3 December 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't know how to handle the nomination. SL93 (talk) 16:19, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK Review Note
DYK review note: Thank you for your review of Template:Did you know nominations/Remarriage. There are still some issues concerning this nomination that may need to be clarified; please respond on that page as soon as possible. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 15:44, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Ruislip GA Review
(Copied from Talk:Ruislip) Hi. Following your nomination I have begun a review here, with expert assistance from User:Nikkimaria. As it stands, the article is well sourced, and well written, but could benefit from some tidying up. There is also a quite heavy focus on the history, which it would be good to address. The review is therefore on hold, allowing seven days for the article to be improved before we make a final decision. If you want to discuss aspects of the review, please make comment on the review page. Thanks! Cucumber Mike (talk) 18:11, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Hi, I'm pleased to say that following your efforts I have been able to pass this as a Good Article! Thanks for your work. Cucumber Mike (talk) 12:12, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Death & Destruction
I left a message here. 72.74.203.189 (talk) 02:35, 11 December 2011 (UTC)

Battle of Radzymin (1920)
What do you mean? Those problems being..? What needs to be done? Do you mean the MILHIST assessment or GA?  // Halibutt 16:53, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Done :)  // Halibutt 21:55, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

DYK for Ruislip High School
Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:04, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE newsletter
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 10:45, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXIX, November 2011
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 20:35, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

GOCE 2011 Year-End Report
Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 06:20, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Military Historian of the Year
Nominations for the "Military Historian of the Year" for 2011 are now open. If you would like to nominate an editor for this award, please do so here. Voting will open on 22 January and run for seven days. Thanks! On behalf of the coordinators, Nick-D (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 23:16, 15 January 2012 (UTC) You were sent this message because you are a listed as a member of the Military history WikiProject.

Orphaned non-free image File:Ruislip Station Metropolitan Railway - Ruislip Past.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Ruislip Station Metropolitan Railway - Ruislip Past.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 07:44, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXX, January 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:06, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

DYK for Harmondsworth Great Barn
Materialscientist (talk) 08:44, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXI, February 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 09:54, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

DYK for The Old Vinyl Factory
Casliber (talk · contribs) 08:01, 22 March 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXII, March 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 02:14, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 00:10, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Image at RAF Stanmore Park
I have spotted that the photo you uploaded to the infobox of RAF Stanmore Park and labelled RAF Stanmore Park is not actually of Stanmore Park. It is an aerial photograph of the wartime government offices complex that later became known as MOD Stanmore, fronting onto the old roman road of Watling Street (the A5 until the 1960s) - at 51.37.2464N 0.17.4783W. This demolished site is now the Brockley Park housing estate.

RAF Stanmore Park was a totally separate complex located two miles south west of MOD Stanmore on the far side of the village, built in the grounds of the stately home called Stanmore Park, sited at 51.36.5467N 0.19.0589W.

Could I suggest that you remove the image from the RAF Stanmore Park article (and possibly build an article for MOD Stanmore where the image would be a good fit). 21st CENTURY  GREENSTUFF 12:30, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Good grief ... no need to apologise. How do you get access to those photos? 21st CENTURY  GREENSTUFF 17:24, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIV, May 2012
The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here. If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 14:46, 25 May 2012 (UTC)