User talk:HarryFromMA


 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=American_Alliance_of_Jews_and_Christians&action=historysubmit&diff=383969370&oldid=382759644 don't you agree it is active force to influence elections and status of "non for profit' should be rejected?

Welcome
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * Welcome!
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page to follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons' policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring and sockpuppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account or IP being blocked from editing.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dougweller (talk) 07:19, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, American Alliance of Jews and Christians. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 07:50, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Use the talk page
If you want to ask a question about an article, simply move your cursor up to the top-left of the screen and click on the bit that says "Talk". Then move it a little way to the right and click "New section". Then type your question into the box that comes up and click "Save page". When reading an article, people don't want to hear what you think's wrong with it.

In response to your question, it's because all of the information is located in the relevant state-specific articles: United States House of Representatives elections in Alabama, 2012, United States House of Representatives election in Alaska, 2012 and so on and so forth. Thanks. – hysteria18 (talk) 15:10, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

May 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Public image of Barack Obama appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this. Thank you. Loonymonkey (talk) 14:47, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Paul Ryan
Hi, thanks for your good faith contributions to Paul Ryan. I have reverted that edit for undue weight to one pollster (the edit summary i accidently left the word poll) but it was also a somewhat malformed edit in that it was not in prose and lists of this sort are frowned on by many. You also included an external link in the body of the work which is not a reference but a direct link without mark up and this is only allowed if the video is being used as the reference and is linked to the copyright owner etc. and added as an inline cition. I will add this to the talkpage so that if there is information that can be salvaged for use editors can help improve the edit. Again, thanks for your contribution and I apologise if this is off putting for any reason. Join the discussion and see what can be done to edit some of this back in if possibe!--Amadscientist (talk) 01:08, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Also, in a second glance at the information it looks as if this might have been directly copied pasted from another source. If this is true, be aware that copyright policy states that we may use the information in original wording only and not directly from the source. please be careful if paraphrasing.--Amadscientist (talk) 01:12, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * It is also important to mention the need to reference these claims when editing them into an article. If you have questions on reliable sources and how to add a reference please do not hesitate to ask me!--Amadscientist (talk) 01:30, 17 August 2012 (UTC)