User talk:HarryMaxwell

{| width="100%" align="center" style="border-spacing:0px; background-color:#000000" {| width="100%" style="background-color:#000000" ! align="left" style="background-color:#0099ff; color:#ffffff; font-size:125%" | HarryMaxwell - My talk page on Wikipedia
 * width="75%" style="vertical-align:top" |
 * align="left" style="background-color:#d7eeff; padding:0.5em" colspan="2" cellspacing="5"|
 * align="left" style="background-color:#d7eeff; padding:0.5em" colspan="2" cellspacing="5"|

Hi there. Why not leave me a message, or ask a question?

Your RFA Nomination
As you will have seen it has been removed. Please do not treat RFA or Wikipedia as some kind of joke as you only waste hardworking contributors time. I hope you will focus on editing and reading this encyclopedia - If I can help out I'd be more than happy to. Pedro | Chat  21:17, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Your request for adminship
Hi, I'm sorry to inform you that I've closed your request for adminship early because it was unlikely to succeed. For users to be granted admin status, they have to show that they are trusted members of the community. Individual editors each have their own standards for adminship candidates, but here are a few tips that may help you pass the next time round:
 * Wait a bit longer before your next request. Many Wikipedians think that the length of time that users should be active on the project to get a firm grasp of all the policies and guidelines is roughly 3 months.
 * Try to get some more edits. Administrators need to show they have a thorough understanding of policy, so it would be a good idea for you to contribute in wikipedia space, article space and talk space to show you can communicate with others.

You may wish to take a look at the admin coaching program, which would allow you to have your own coach who could personally direct you along the right path, or consider an editor review, allowing other users to comment on your edits and give you ways to improve. The guide to requests for adminship provides further considerations to make before applying again. Let me thank you for your contributions so far, and if you follow the above advice, there is no reason why you can not have a successful RfA in the future. Shalom Hello 21:18, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
 * We have a policy not to bite newcomers. RFA is a kind of war zone among longtime contributors, and we don't want you to get caught in the cross-fire.  Just sit back, click on the "Community Portal" (link on the left sidebar) and find something useful to do. :) Shalom Hello 21:22, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

July 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/HarryMaxwell, you will be blocked from editing. ~  Wi ki  her mit  21:18, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Continued vandalism at WP:RFA
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Pedro | Chat  21:19, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Question
Could you explain this edit? ~  Wi ki  her mit  21:20, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on HM Tiger, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dark Falls  talk 23:10, 1 July 2007 (UTC)


 * It's not okay to use multiple accounts to evade an indefinite block, esp. over issues of libel - A l is o n  ☺ 23:18, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Spratton Hall School
A template has been added to the article Spratton Hall School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with db-author. Charlene 04:33, 18 July 2007 (UTC)