User talk:Harry From Oxford

October 2019
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Anjana Chaudhari, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Jeb3 Talk at me here What I've Done 11:56, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of TomasDeGoat


Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as TomasDeGoat, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 14:39, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Wagwan


Please do not introduce inappropriate pages, such as Wagwan, to Wikipedia. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been deleted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion Review — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 14:39, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 14:39, 4 December 2020 (UTC)

i will make helpful comment on pre existing articles and make real edits that will benefit articles eg. grammatical fixes, fact checks. fyi i really need this i am a student at Oxford i have have to create a factual wikipedia article on a research topic that i have been researching for a year now to get my masters degree please reconsider your evaluation. Sincerely,

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:59, 7 December 2020 (UTC)