User talk:Harry Potter


 * Some talk moved to Talk:Anthony Hancock Paintings and Sculptures: A Retrospective Exhibition

Archive on User:Harry Potter/Archive1

Hi, can you provide a source for the reenslavement near the end of the war? I'm not sure that the mention belongs at the end of the section talking about the Confederate form of government and constitution which is the main focus of the paragraph.Ark30inf 00:02, 22 Aug 2003 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the reply. The only thing I found on the net was a Yahoo! message board message.  But that message happened to have sourcing on it.  It apparently came from a broadside.  I'm surprised that the contents of this broadside are not elsewhere on the net.  It seems like a pretty important one.Ark30inf 02:55, 22 Aug 2003 (UTC)

At the anarcho-punk page, you add the final sentence to this paragraph:

"Many anarcho-punk bands were showcased on the Bullshit Detector series of LPs released by Crass Records and Resistance Productions Records between 1980 and 1994. These were commodities sold in the market place albeit with an anti-capitalist ideology as a gloss. "

A few comments on it.


 * The phrase "as a gloss" implies that the anti-capitalist ideology was added to the commodity as a selling point, but was not held by the people who produced the commodity. What evidence do you have to support this implication? Is it generally true, or true in some cases but not others?


 * Reply: Well I certainly felt so at the time. You later recall the price, which was prominently displayed. I think my remarks specifcally refer to Bullshit Detector, though no doubt they also include others.Harry Potter 18:47, 26 Aug 2003 (UTC)


 * Also, your observation that punk records are commodities could just as well be made of radical textual commodities, such as "Guy Debord is Really Dead" or "The Philosopher's Stone". Why make this criticism only of punk records? It would appear that your criticism comes from a logocentric position.


 * Of course it was no more or less possible to disentangle record production from commodity product any more than it is textual reproduction. However the texts you site are ideal to counterpose a rather special difference: The gyration of pop music is to privilege performance over content. Thus it is the performer which is promoted over the song/tune. Compare Sun Ra, whoe produced records with no information on the sleeve and some times you were lucky if teh disc itseklf ahd the name written on in marker pen - (would you want to sit there writing names on). Now compare Luther Blissett and J. K. Rowling: Blissett's texts is explicitly without copyright whereas J. K. Rowling has signed extensive franchising deals. These not only cover her text but the iconic image of such people as Harry Potter. (Please check the issue raised by MammaBear now in Harrypotter/Archive1. The commodity is pamphlet, not the text. Now of course there was Stewart Home's proposal to have multiple name punk bands . . .Harry Potter 18:47, 26 Aug 2003 (UTC)


 * Furthermore the whole sentence makes a judgement as though it were the objective truth of the situation. However, others might equally well contend that the anarchist politics were the intended central element of the product and the commodity aspect were an unfortunate necessity. This argument would be backed up by the very low price attached to the Bullshit Detector albums, (I think the first one was one pound twenty-five pence) which prevented them from acting as effective capital-commodities for the producers (I mean that I believe they did not accumulate capital through them). No doubt the shops and distributers made money though.


 * It would be folly to take a single object out of the context which produced it. The central element of the product is a hole through which a spindle goes so that the record can be played. When bands give away free records with teen magazines, this is not because they have abandoned commodity production, but because they feel that they will benefit from it overall. Harry Potter 18:47, 26 Aug 2003 (UTC)


 * Anarcho-punk records, whatever their musical, artistic, theoretical and practical faults, acted in some instances as a method of communication among a "large" group of radical individuals. They can therefore be compared with more traditional forms of radical communications such as pamphlets and posters. The form carries its own problems but does not necessarily nullify the specific theoretical content.


 * Music has been a traditional form of radical communication long before pamphlets and posters, whether it be songs, drumming or other forms. the song, the rhythm can readily be adopted by others. Likewise texts can be circulated, amended and developed. However the privileging of performance is not a question of form but of a social relation in cultural production. Of course it does not nullify any specific content, whether radical or reactionary.Harry Potter 18:47, 26 Aug 2003 (UTC)


 * One significant point about anarcho-punk was that it was political as well as being a popular musical sub-culture. So it can easily be presented in a one-side way as a producer of radical initiatives or alternatively as a producer of commodities. It was both of these.


 * I hope my addition helped convey this.Harry Potter 18:47, 26 Aug 2003 (UTC)


 * The comments on identity seem less problematic.

Wasn't too hard to find, though I had to re-size it. I'm just glad I didn't get caught in an edit conflict, didn't realize you were doing the article in stages. :) - Hephaestos 06:35, 27 Aug 2003 (UTC)

Red Clydeside Article
Hi there, in the articel on Red Clydeside you added a bit about racist agitation that Shinwell was involved with. I have never heard of this before and was hoping you could point me in the direction of your source for this information as I would certainly be interested in reading up on it.

You support Harry Potter? SHAME!!!!!!!!1 Cheers, JDH

Brentwood, Essex
You added info about an Elephant training school in Brentwood. Can you provide any more info or a source for what seems an unlikely fact? A response on Talk:Brentwood, Essex would be appropriate. --Tagishsimon (talk)

Article Licensing
Hi, I've started a drive to get users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) v1.0 and v2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to Wikipedia's license, the GFDL, but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles. Since you are among the top 2000 Wikipedians by edits, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles. Over 90% of people asked have agreed. For More Information:
 * Multi-Licensing FAQ - Lots of questions answered
 * Multi-Licensing Guide
 * Free the Rambot Articles Project

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the " " template into their user page, but there are other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:


 * Option 1
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR
 * Option 2
 * I agree to multi-license all my contributions to any U.S. state, county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace " " with "  ". If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know what you think at my talk page. It's important to know either way so no one keeps asking. -- Ram-Man (comment| talk)

Rosicrucian article
Dear user Harry Potter, as I have seen an edition of yours at the article Rosicrucian, I come to request your support to this article that I have just purposed for nomination at Featured_article_candidates. May you may give a look into it? And, if you consider it acceptable, then may you support it? Thank you! :) --GalaazV 02:49, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

Deleted page "Guy Smallman"
A page you created, or image you uploaded, Guy Smallman, has been [ deleted] in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets the one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:


 * Unremarkable people, groups, companies and web content. An article about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content that does not assert the importance or significance of its subject.

Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable notability guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content; it will be deleted again and may be protected from re-creation. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article. If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you – Gurch 05:32, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Hi there :) I'd be happy to intoduce you to Wikipedia. Is there anything specific you need help with? Useful pages include Cheatsheet. I'll post the standard welcome message below. Let me know if you need any more help, but head on over to WikiProject Harry Potter and start helping us out :) Thanks, –  Eisenhower  official    (e)  16:48, 12 March 2006 (UTC) 19:55, 28 February 2007 (UTC)
 * }

Laura Norder
I have added a "" template to the article Laura Norder, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram 13:20, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

We Get Restless
I have added a "" template to the article We Get Restless, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Fram 13:21, 19 March 2007 (UTC)

happy


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Notability of London Action Resource Centre
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on London Action Resource Centre, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because London Action Resource Centre seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting London Action Resource Centre, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 14:09, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

hi


has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. hello!!!!!!*Lover of the sand 21:35, 7 November 2007 (UTC)*

AfD nomination of New Lettrist International
An article that you have been involved in editing, New Lettrist International, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/New Lettrist International (2nd nomination). Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 21:59, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Dingly Askham
Another editor has added the " " template to the article Dingly Askham, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also What Wikipedia is not and Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the  template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:29, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Harry Potter! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created  are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the list:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:02, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) André Frankin -
 * 2) Piero Simondo -
 * 3) Dan Georgakas -

Wikipedia event Imperial College
Hi Fabian, just to say, I have decided that 16th Feb is probably the best day to hold the event at South Kensington. I'll be going to the meetup Feb 13th. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinnypatel (talk • contribs) 01:38, 2 February 2011 (UTC)

Mutual aquaintance?
Hi, I was talking to a long standing friend of mine, Simon Crook, who says he wrote an article about COBRA and shamanism for Transgressions. I gather you might know him through that.--Peter cohen (talk) 17:51, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Arthur Mooring


A tag has been placed on Arthur Mooring requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Frungi (talk) 04:53, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Arthur Mooring


The article Arthur Mooring has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This has been unsourced since creation in 2003, and I'm having trouble finding any evidence of notability—I can't find sources that say much beyond that he was alive.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Frungi (talk) 18:26, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Jacques Ovadia for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jacques Ovadia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Jacques Ovadia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Agricola44 (talk) 16:04, 18 October 2017 (UTC)