User talk:Harryflatters

Speedy deletion nomination of Dynamic steady state universe theory
Hello Harryflatters,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Dynamic steady state universe theory for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, :.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Bensci54 (talk) 01:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of "Dynamic steady state universe"
It's alright that you have problems with the Big Bang theory, but Wikipedia is not to place to voice them, so long as your concerns constitute original research. If the theory you discussed truly is different than Steady State theory, you did not make that fact clear enough in the article to save it from deletion. If you have reliable sources to back up your claims, feel free to re-write your article, making sure to cite your sources, and highlighing what makes this particular cosmological theory unique. Please don't just copy and paste your old article, though. It will just get deleted again. Bensci54 (talk) 22:42, 10 January 2013 (UTC)


 * im only here because i thought the theory may deserve a mention
 * its not my theory.i came across it and it seems to answer many of my own problems with big bang.
 * im not qualified to decide its merit i just thought it deserved consideration, as lots of trivia :is found on wiki


 * ive never used a format like this before and struggled to navigate through editing.
 * what i wrote was incomplete,poorly edted and poorly referenced just a very rough summary of my :understanding. it needed tidying up.


 * i was only really asking for a page to be created or a reference made somewhere.
 * it is also found as "cellular universe model".
 * it may have big flaws i dont know, i tried to write impartially.
 * the theory seems to answer my questions it may answer other peoples, all the theories seem to have :flaws in them.
 * this theory seems to be out there, i found it, i thought others might want to.
 * it seems i dont understand how wiki works and i wasted my time.
 * its certainly not a duplicate of "steady state".the reason given for deleting
 * regards shaun


 * It sounds that the article may have been legitimate, and that your edits were made in good faith. I may have requested it be deleted in error, for I did not know that it was a different theory. I didn't mean to scare you away from Wikipedia. I have put up a request that the article be undeleted.Bensci54 (talk) 00:32, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Restored to User:Harryflatters/sandbox. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 01:13, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or  located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:44, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

In response to your feedback
I have a lot of good links in my user page if you need help editing. I can also help you edit and move your article from sandbox to an actual page. Feel free to contact me on my talk page with any questions!

— Ross coolguy CVU 19:45, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

&#160;

Concerning your article in sandbox
I've fixed the references, so the only thing left is adding the image. You can upload it using "Upload a file" in toolbox on the left. It is very important that you have the rights to upload the image. You may have to ask for permission from the site you got it from. If it was uploaded under the creative commons licence you do not have to ask permission. If you cannot get the permissions I think that the article is ok without it. — Ross coolguy CVU &#124;   My Talk   00:05, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

I would also suggest changing the name from "Dynamic Steady State Universe Theory" to "Dynamic Universe Model" because:

1.People will not think it is the same thing as Steady State Universe Theory

2. It may be the more common name for it. http://vaksdynamicuniversemodel.blogspot.ca But i'm not sure if these are the same thing. Thanks — Ross coolguy CVU &#124;   My Talk   00:10, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Dynamic...
I didn't mean to say change the name of the theory, I just thought they were the same thing. No problem, it was a pleasure! — Ross coolguy CVU &#124;   My Talk   02:51, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
— Ross coolguy CVU &#124;   My Talk   13:14, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Almost done!
It seems you are almost ready to make it an article! It seems the image was removed though. Do you plan to make a diagram or do you want to upload it without an image? Sorry about that guy on my talk page btw. — Ross <font color=#0101DF>coolguy <font color=#AA02DD>CVU &#124;   My Talk   15:38, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
— <font color=#FF6200>Ross <font color=#0101DF>coolguy <font color=#AA02DD>CVU &#124;   My Talk   16:44, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

It's done :)
Dynamic Steady State Universe Theory in your sandbox, is now an actual article. Congrats! — <font color=#FF6200>Ross <font color=#0101DF>coolguy <font color=#AA02DD>CVU &#124;   My Talk   17:28, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Dynamic Steady State Universe Theory for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dynamic Steady State Universe Theory is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Dynamic Steady State Universe Theory until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JohnCD (talk) 21:28, 13 January 2013 (UTC)