User talk:Harryjamesfan123

August 2017
Hello, I'm 331dot. I noticed that you made a change to an article, MyLifeAsHarrison, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Please note that IMDB is not considered a reliable source, as it is user-editable. If you have any non-user editable sources like news stories or reviews, please offer them.'' 331dot (talk) 22:26, 19 August 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 20)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Harryjamesfan123/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the or on the.
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KGirl (Wanna chat?) 00:37, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

References vs. wikilinks
I noticed in MyLifeAsHarrison, there were a bunch of things that looked like this:


 * People termed him as Instagram's Rising Star.

I suspect that what you wanted was not a footnote saying "Instagram", but rather a link to the Wikipedia page Instagram. The way you would do that would be to put the word in double brackets (known as a "wikilink"), like this:

Instagram

displays as:

Instagram

Please use the format for things that actually should be footnotes, such as citations to sources that help prove the statements in the article are correct. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 17:12, 27 August 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of MyLifeAsHarrison


The article MyLifeAsHarrison has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "none of the references support the subject's claim to notability"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:00, 29 August 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of MyLifeAsHarrison for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MyLifeAsHarrison is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/MyLifeAsHarrison until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:52, 30 August 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:37, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:41, 2 September 2017 (UTC) Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you may be blocked from editing. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:45, 2 September 2017 (UTC)
 * My experience here is that when an account resorts to removing the AfD template, they've conceded that the article is indeed flimsy. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:41, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:48, 2 September 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Alexf(talk) 14:52, 2 September 2017 (UTC)