User talk:Harryklein

June 2015
Hello, I'm Egghead06. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Leo Green, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Egghead06 (talk) 18:38, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

How to edit when you have a conflict of interest
Hello, Harryklein. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 17:48, 28 February 2020 (UTC)

Leo Green
You already know this, because another editor told you in 2015, but here's a repeat... One of the pillars of Wikipedia is to write from a neutral point of view. This means using reliable sources, including for biographies of living people. So, your recent edit of Leo Green has been reverted, because it restored content that is unsourced or is from sources that are not independent of Green himself. Please read through the requirements linked to here, and get in touch if anything's not clear. EddieHugh (talk) 17:55, 28 February 2020 (UTC)
 * Why did you ignore all of this information by putting lots of badly sourced and unsourced information back? The WP:BURDEN is on you to provide reliable sources for every bit of information that has been removed from the article. I strongly encourage you to engage here or on the Leo Green talk page. Repeatedly putting unsourced and badly sourced information into a biography of a living person, without any explanation or edit summary, will end badly: people who do it usually end up blocked. I urge you again to read the information linked to above, by both me and Ponyo, and please don't (near-)revert again. EddieHugh (talk) 17:18, 3 March 2020 (UTC)

Harryklein, please ensure you are using the article talk page to make edit requests as described in my message above. If you continue to edit the article directly to add or restore unsourced or promotionally-toned content, I will block you from editing the article moving forward.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 18:53, 3 March 2020 (UTC)


 * Regarding your email: as advised in my message above, please use the article talk page to request specific changes to the article using the request edit template (if you click the link you will see the instruction page for its use). Please ensure you include a reliable source for each edit you request so that reviewers are able to verify the content.-- Jezebel's Ponyo bons mots 23:32, 5 March 2020 (UTC)