User talk:Harrz/2022

Untitled
Hello! Thank you for your work on Storm Eunice, and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you enjoy your stay here. Pohjamadesse1 (talk) 18:37, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Fairlight Primary & Nursery School for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Fairlight Primary & Nursery School is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Fairlight Primary & Nursery School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 21:54, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited PRH, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Princess Royal Hospital. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Thanks for contributing to the article Royal Sussex County Hospital. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. Please help by adding more sources to the article you edited, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the claims (see here for how to do inline referencing). If you need further help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse, or just ask me. Thank you. Dormskirk (talk) 23:07, 12 March 2022 (UTC)

Moved your file from Wikimedia Commons to the English Wikipedia
Hi there, Grey13z! I've reuploaded the logo you uploaded on Wikimedia Commons as here on the English Wikipedia at File:Ghibli Park logo.svg. The logo you uploaded is not available under a free license, so it can only be uploaded locally (i.e. on the wiki it will be used on) and under a non-free use rationale. I've done the required technicalities of marking it as a non-free image, so that you don't need to do any additional complicated work. I've also requested the image on Commons for deletion as a formality, please don't take it as an insult or anything! In case you'll upload a logo again in the future, take a look at our page on logos, as it includes a guide on how to upload a logo. Thank you for your contributions, congrats on the new article, and welcome to Wikipedia! Chlod (say hi!) 15:23, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Grey13z! Your additions to Ghibli Park have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 15:49, 13 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi Grey13z. Thanks for your work on the Ghibli Park article. However, please don't copy text from other websites. Any information you add to Wikipedia needs to be summarized in your own words. I sometimes find it helpful to read the source material, then try to summarize it without directly referring to it (of course you can look at it afterwards, but this might help avoid the temptation of using the same or substantially similar phrasing). In the meantime, it is better to have no information on something rather than text that infringes the copyright of others. Please let me know if you have any questions. DanCherek (talk) 21:28, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from List of tallest buildings in the United States into List of the tallest buildings in the Americas. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 19:31, 18 March 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Islamophobic incidents, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Montpelier.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Elf Bar


A tag has been placed on Elf Bar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Bbb23 (talk) 23:13, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Why are you posting messages in Thai welcoming yourself to the Thai wikipedia?--Bbb23 (talk) 18:44, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I was moving it from the Thai Wiki to this one? Grey13z (talk) 19:09, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Why?--Bbb23 (talk) 19:50, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Am I not allowed to? Grey13z (talk) 20:09, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * It's not something that's appropriate for your Talk page. You also didn't answer my question.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:28, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Why isn't it appropriate? It was on the thai talk page which is the reason I put it here. Grey13z (talk) 20:32, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Your Talk page here is to be used to communicate with other editors, not to transfer a communication from your Talk page on another wiki. The fact that you think otherwise makes me wonder about your competence to edit here. Just don't do it anymore.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:38, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I think I do have 'competence' to edit here, especially considering this is a user talk page and not an article, or even an article's talk page. Grey13z (talk) 20:44, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * If it's ok with you, I'm gonna add it back in about an hour so if you've got any objections you have time to say. Grey13z (talk) 13:20, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
 * It's not okay with me, but, although ill-advised, in and of itself it's not blockable conduct.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:53, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Nettleton Court and Dudeney Lodge for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nettleton Court and Dudeney Lodge is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Nettleton Court and Dudeney Lodge until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MB 18:04, 3 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, Grey13z

Thank you for creating George Montague.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 20:43, 12 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of 2022 Scarborough shooting for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2022 Scarborough shooting is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2022 Scarborough shooting until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. North8000 (talk) 01:52, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Kingstanding explosion for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kingstanding explosion is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kingstanding explosion until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. MB 02:08, 12 July 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2022 European heat waves, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Faro. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 16 July 2022 (UTC)

Daily Mail reference at 2022 United Kingdom heat wave
Hi. Please do not use the Daily Mail as you did at 2022 United Kingdom heat wave. It is not a reliable source. See WP:DAILYMAIL. Kind regards, Robby.is.on (talk) 22:45, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I tried to find a better source earlier but the only one I could find which said there were 10 deaths was the Daily Mail.. I'll try to find a different source. Greyzxq (talk) 23:07, 18 July 2022 (UTC)
 * OK. Going forward, if only an unreliable source like the Daily Mail reports something, it's better to not include it. Happy editing, Robby.is.on (talk) 23:22, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

Isle of Skye shootings
Why do you insist on having two articles for the same subject? Fram (talk) 12:27, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I don’t, it just takes some time to change them. Isle of Skye shootings should be the one that stays, but as i was doing it you reverted my edits which meant i had to redo it greyzxq  talk 12:36, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Why should the one you created later be the one that stays? Shouldn't you, I don't know, let uninvolved people decide this instead of you? Fram (talk) 13:05, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Seeing as the article I created was deleted without discussion despite having more information and being more correct, the article I made should be the one that stays. If you disagree and think the other was better, feel free to start a discussion on the actual page instead of my talk page. greyzxq  talk 13:17, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * You reverted it even when your text was at the older title, so apparently that isn't the reason after all. Fram (talk) 13:21, 11 August 2022 (UTC)
 * I did say in one of the edit summaries that I didn't mean to publish the last edit if that's what you mean..? greyzxq  talk 13:36, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

Creeslough explosion
Hey greyzxq. With regards to your new article Creeslough explosion, I'm not sure that the topic passes the spirit of WP:NOTNEWS. I also suggest you read WP:10YEARS if you haven't yet. Although it's quite the freak accident, 3 deaths is not that many in the scheme of things. Unless we get some more coverage, like maybe from the perspective of corporate or government negligence, it will probably be deleted. Cheers! Ovinus (talk) 22:40, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for letting me know. I'll be sure to update the article for anything that may make it more notable/newsworthy. greyzxq  talk 22:51, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 21
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chūō, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chūō-ku.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Montcada i Reixac rail crash moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Montcada i Reixac rail crash, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  TT me 12:47, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi, I've since added information and more citations to the article. It would be very appreciated if you could look at it again and let me know if you think it's ready for the mainspace yet, and if not I would appreciate feedback. Thanks, greyzxq  talk 23:24, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Sorry, just reread your comment. I'll submit it for review now. greyzxq  talk 23:26, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

December 2022
Please do not add or change content, as you did at List of rail accidents (2020–present), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. David Biddulph (talk) 17:12, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Apologies, when I added the content there was an article for the crash which had all the information in it. I've added a ref now. greyzxq  talk 17:18, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Incorrect use of minor edits check box on Elizabeth II
Hi Greyzxq! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Elizabeth II that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 22:41, 25 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Okay, thanks for letting me know! greyzxq  talk 22:44, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

Not sure that's right
I don't think your revert here is correct. The lede and text are standalone when it comes to matters such as inline, full name, etc. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2022_New_York_City_Subway_attack&diff=1129720424&oldid=1129714527 2603:7000:2143:8500:B969:F3CB:10CD:7023 (talk) 22:55, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Probably should have mentioned this in the edit summary, but if you look at MOS:SURNAME it says "After the initial mention, a person should generally be referred to by surname only". greyzxq  talk 23:56, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Wallasey pub shooting, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tranmere.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

Planet Ice Peterborough moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Planet Ice Peterborough, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ––FormalDude (talk)  01:50, 28 December 2022 (UTC)