User talk:Harshal Srinivasu

Welcome!
Hello, Harshal Srinivasu, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Kathathmikaa, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at the our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * How to write a great article
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! EN - Jungwon  09:21, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Kathathmikaa


A tag has been placed on Kathathmikaa, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. EN - Jungwon  09:21, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Harshal S


A tag has been placed on Harshal S, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. EN - Jungwon  09:21, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

About your pages
Hi, Harshal, I'm the admin who reviewed the speedy deletion requests that put on your pages. I'm afraid that I agree with their assessment, and I've deleted the pages. I know that's disappointing for you, but ultimately, Wikipedia is not the right place for these kinds of pages. Wikipedia is not a place to spread the word about something that exists; it's only for recording information that has already been written elsewhere. If anything, the intent is for Wikipedia to be the last place for information about a particular subject to be published. This is ultimately due to Wikipedia's core tenet of verifiability, that all information on Wikipedia can be cited to a reliable source that supports it. This is important because, at the end of the day, a citation to a reliable source is the only way we can know that the information we have is accurate.

Also, Wikipedia strongly discourages people from writing articles about themselves. This is due to the inherent conflict of interest that would prevent one from being able to write from a neutral point-of-view about oneself, which Wikipedia requires. It's also worth noting that exposure on Wikipedia is not always a good thing, and can attract unpleasantness from vandals and the like. So you should seriously reconsider wanting to write an article about yourself.

Like I say, I'm sorry that that's probably pretty disappointing. It's absolutely nothing personal towards you; these standards apply to everyone and everything. If you have any more questions, let me know. Writ Keeper &#9863;&#9812; 09:57, 31 May 2021 (UTC)