User talk:Harshvardhanmahipal

Speedy deletion nomination of Justap media p ltd
Hello Harshvardhanmahipal,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Justap media p ltd for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Erick Shepherd (talk) 14:35, 7 April 2016 (UTC)

Justap
Hi, you attempted to leave a message on my talk page which was reverted by another editor, I guess because it had no heading, was posted form an ISP address and included an email address.

I deleted your article because Please do not edit further until you respond to this message.
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the company, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company claims or interviewing its management. You gave no references at all
 * There is no evidence that it meets the notability criteria. It's a start-up, and we are not told any hard verifiable facts such as the number of employees, turnover or profits, or even where it is based.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: unique set of people... provide 100% customer engagement... the best & fresh... the best content which will keep passengers engaged and entertained... Our platform will give the best possible brand recognition and also generate leads...&mdash; spam, spam, spam
 * the article was a copyright violation of their YouTube page (even the spelling mistake was the same). Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient. But in any case the copyrighted text is far too promotional to be useful for Wikipedia's purposes, so there would not be any point in your jumping through all the hoops that are required.
 *  our company page You have a conflict of interest when editing this article, and you must declare it. Paid advocacy on behalf of a company is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not. You are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly. Regardless, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:   .

Basically, you have mistaken Wikipedia for a free advertising platform, and have ignored all our rules Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:34, 9 April 2016 (UTC)