User talk:Hartspring

Ross Lockridge Jr.
I didn't remove your additions to the footnotes for the article on Ross Lockridge Jr., but I was considering asking you to do it. Wikipedia, of course, is an encyclopedia, and its policies emphasize writing from "a neutral point of view." Anyone who disputes the accuracy of a statement or reference should raise the issue on the article's "talk" page. I fully respect your personal concern about the way certain things are presented in the article; but Talk:Ross Lockridge Jr. is the place to air arguments for how the facts should be presented. Of course, if there are published sources that demonstrate opposing views of the facts, mentioning and footnoting them in the article -- always from a neutral point of view -- is perfectly acceptable. -- Cuppysfriend (talk) 15:50, 20 April 2015 (UTC)