User talk:Hartsseeks

Welcome!
Hi Hartsseeks! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Darren-M  talk  18:57, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Ways to improve Nadia Azhgikhina
Hello, Hartsseeks,

Thank you for creating Nadia Azhgikhina.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"Thank you for your contribution! By chance are tou aware of more sources that describe Axhgikhina or her work, like profiles, book reviews, etc.? If they are in Russian that’s fine! We just need to know they exist (and incorporate information from them into the entry) to meet the standard for including the entry in the encyclopedia. You can read more at WP:NPERSON or please feel free to ask me any questions you may have. Thank you!"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Innisfree987 (talk) 16:50, 18 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Emily Tamkin for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emily Tamkin is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Emily Tamkin until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:27, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Mark! Lopez moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Mark! Lopez, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 17:11, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Destiny Watford for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Destiny Watford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Destiny Watford until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 20:23, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Yvonne Savio for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Yvonne Savio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Yvonne Savio until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. nearlyevil 665  18:11, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gail Reals, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Syracuse. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Articles
Thanks for all the new articles but we do not need to add medal competitions when they did not have won a medal, those can be added when they have something won. Just leave it empty like this, thanks. Kante4 (talk) 16:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Duplicate article
Hello Hartsseeks, I just merged your recent stub Lara Dallmann-Weiss into Lara Dallman-Weiss as an obvious duplicate – just thought you might want to know.  Angry Harpy   talk 04:42, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Please slow down
Hallo, You created Naomi Katoka though we already had an article at the right spelling, Naomie Katoka (I've made it into a redirect, as a plausible misspelling). But I see that the DEFAULTSORT was "Tursunkulova, Nigora", which suggests that you are creating articles too fast and not checking what you're doing. I see there's another duplicate article noticed in the previous post. We don't need to get all the Olympians into the encyclopedia today, but we do need to get them right. Thanks. Pam D  14:19, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Article rating
Thank you for tagging your articles with the respective Wikiprojects. May I ask, though, that you leave rating those projects to others? The reason I'm saying that is that you are rating articles as start class when they are obvious stubs.  Schwede 66  23:09, 14 August 2021 (UTC)


 * I normally rate stub, and it was only one or two start, but thanks for noticing. --Hartsseeks (talk) 17:06, 16 August 2021 (UTC)