User talk:HarvardOxon

HarvardOxon has agreed to leave the Wikipedia community permanently.

This accoutn is now abandonned.


 * I hope you change your mind at some point. Your contributions were good. Gimmetrow 04:32, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Heck
I needed a Latin translation, and always useful to get a second opinion. Never mind! -- Kendrick7talk 21:01, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:JackPearl3.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:JackPearl3.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:57, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Image:JackPearl1.jpg
I have tagged Image:JackPearl1.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Some examples can be found at Use rationale examples. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags/Non-free. Thank you. Rettetast (talk) 17:32, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:JackPearl2.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:JackPearl2.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 12:09, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:JackPearl3.jpg


The file File:JackPearl3.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "WP:DECORATIVE use of a non-free book cover in Jack Pearl. Non-free book covers are generally allowed to be used for primary identification purposes in stand-alone articles about the books they represent, but their use in other articles or other ways is generally only allowed when the cover art itself is the subject of sourced critical commentary as explained in WP:NFC and context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC is evident. There is no such commentary for this particular book cover anywhere in the article, and thus removing it from the article is not really going to be detrimental to the reader's understanding in any significant way."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:13, 11 January 2023 (UTC)