User talk:Harvey100

Feel free to leave feedback I am a casual user however and may take a while to respond.

Harvey100 16:18, 5 February 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Hurricane Ismael
This is your only warning. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you have on Talk:Hurricane Ismael, you will be blocked. There is no reason to go on a tirade because an article you opposed on FAC managed to become one. --Core desat  05:15, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Nice try all my comments were constructive until I was mocked. I live in America by the way (free speech is practiced there) where do you live? Harvey100 16:10, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Oh and I and two others opposed for exactly the same reasons, and we were completely ignored. The vote was 5-3 hardly consensus. I'd say that's reason to speak up. Harvey100 16:18, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
 * First of all, you are not contesting the promotion properly - throwing a temper tantrum on the article's talk page isn't going to do anything but annoy other editors (which, it appears, you have). Contest it on WP:FAR after a few weeks. Secondly, please read "Supporting and objecting" on WP:FAC - "Each objection must provide a specific rationale that can be addressed. If nothing can be done in principle to address the objection, the FA Director may ignore it." It was well within Raul654's discretion to ignore your object argument and promote the article, as he likely deemed your objections not to be actionable. --Core desat  00:41, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Must be nice to work on the Hurricane articles and know that Hurricane editors like no other Wikipedians can put 2 days of work into an article and make it an FA. Harvey100 11:54, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
 * It doesn't necessarily take a long time to write a FA. Again, if you have a problem with it, take it up with the FA director. --Core desat  20:21, 7 February 2007 (UTC)

Michael Jordan
i noticed you made a comment before on the MJ talkpage, as well as some edits to the article itself. currently the article is going through a FAC, might you be interested in looking at the article and comment if it's really as horrendous as some have made it out to be? thanks. Chensiyuan 09:07, 8 March 2007 (UTC)