User talk:Hasanjac

Welcome!
Hello, Hasanjac, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! clpo13(talk) 20:01, 3 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Good luck
I see you tried to put the text of the article I deleted, An Efficient Strategy in Capturing Drug Users, on Wikipedia by pasting it on a random talkpage, Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship. That's not the way to go, and I'm glad to see you have now created a sandbox with the same text and submitted it via Articles for creation. It's not ready to be an article, but I hope the AfC reviewers can give you advice about how to change it. You can also ask for general advice at Teahouse, a friendly space for new users. That might be a good thing to do while you wait for AfC review. And, finally, you should try to edit existing Wikipedia articles, not just create new pages. That's the way to learn. Bishonen &#124; talk 19:39, 8 April 2016 (UTC).

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 8)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Hasanjac/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Hasanjac/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Hasanjac/sandbox reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:14, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 9)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Hasanjac/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Hasanjac/sandbox Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dodger67&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Hasanjac/sandbox reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 11:40, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * You continue to create work for others without addressing the serious issues raised. Why? If you persist in doing this you may find yourself blocked from editing. Talk with us. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:59, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Material removed, please use another site for it
I've removed some of the material you've put on this page. I suppose you added it here because it wasn't allowed in articles. But I'm afraid it's not allowed anywhere on Wikipedia. I'm sure there are sites out there where your material will be welcomed, but it doesn't fit on Wikipedia. Please read these policies: WP:FORUM, WP:NOTSOAPBOX, WP:NOTWEBHOST. As for this talkpage, it's for you to communicate with other users. Try it, please. Respond to what people say to you. Bishonen &#124; talk 19:14, 12 April 2016 (UTC).
 * I've again removed various vaguely promotional material added to this page after my warning above. Since the user hasn't edited for a month, it's probably unnecessary to block them. But if you come back and again edit in the same way, Hasanjac, I'm afraid you will be blocked from editing. This is your last warning. Bishonen &#124; talk 19:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC).

Speedy deletion nomination of Prescribed Tablet Terminology Every Mother or father Should Know - Opiates and Downers
Hello Hasanjac,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Prescribed Tablet Terminology Every Mother or father Should Know - Opiates and Downers for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 12:19, 24 April 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Book Review - "Beyond Belief" by Josh Hamilton for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Book Review - "Beyond Belief" by Josh Hamilton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Book Review - "Beyond Belief" by Josh Hamilton until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Crow Caw  16:00, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

May 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Book Review - "Beyond Belief" by Josh Hamilton. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Mz7 (talk) 22:23, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Book Review - "Beyond Belief" by Josh Hamilton


The article Book Review - "Beyond Belief" by Josh Hamilton has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No refs. Not encyclopaedic. Should be a CSD if there was an appropriate category

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  Velella  Velella Talk 22:56, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of On the internet Education and studying Achievements Story: Developing a New Destiny
Hello Hasanjac,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged On the internet Education and studying Achievements Story: Developing a New Destiny for deletion, because it's too short to identify the subject of the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. • Arts Rescuer 18:46, 17 May 2016 (UTC)