User talk:Hasbino

Welcome
 Hello Hasbino, and Welcome to Wikipedia!  Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

--- Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:


 * Table of contents / Department directory


 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

Need help?


 * Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
 * Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
 * Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations


 * Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
 * The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
 * Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:


 * Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help


 * Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...


 * Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes ( ~ ). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The [[File:Button sig.png]] or [[File:Insert-signature.png]] button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
 * If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Hasbino, good luck, and have fun. – Chamith   (talk)  02:54, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Interested in Twinkle?
I have seen your editing history, and I had noticed your use of the undo function multiple times when trying to revert one user's edits. Well there is this tool called Twinkle which you can use to revert a user's edits in one click. If you are interested in getting it, you may go to Preferences --> Gadgets --> then tick the Twinkle box. If you are interested for more information about Twinkle, you may click this link here. Qwertyxp2000 (talk &#124; contribs) 10:01, 28 December 2015 (UTC)

Inside Out
Hi, are you still around? I was thinking of reviewing the article. FunkMonk (talk) 16:29, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for offering but it seems like someone else has begun reviewing the article. But you can still contribute and discuss in the review as soon as he provides feedback. Hasbino (talk) 09:17, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Inside Out (2015 film)
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Inside Out (2015 film) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Llywrch -- Llywrch (talk) 19:01, 29 February 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for accepting to review the article. I'll do my best to respond to your feedbacks as soon as I can. --Hasbino (talk) 09:22, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

I've finally gotten to writing up my review on this article. (Sorry again for the delay.) It looks very promising, & while I would like to promote it to GA I did have some concerns -- some more important than others -- & if that edit war on the article continues, let me know & I'll use my Admin privileges to put a stop to it. -- llywrch (talk) 05:50, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Inside Out (2015 film)
The article Inside Out (2015 film) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Inside Out (2015 film) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Llywrch -- Llywrch (talk) 06:01, 14 March 2016 (UTC)


 * Okay, after too much time (on my part) in this process, I've gone ahead & promoted this article to GA. I would have done this weeks ago since at the time I felt it met all of the criteria, but since there was interest from others -- & the plot summary was being revised on a constant basis -- I held off. (Well, actually I've been busy in real life, too.) So congratulations! -- llywrch (talk) 20:19, 19 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Thank you so much, Llywrch! I appreciate all the work you have done reviewing the article. Hasbino (talk) 14:47, 20 April 2016 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Inside Out (2015 film)
The article Inside Out (2015 film) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Inside Out (2015 film) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Llywrch -- Llywrch (talk) 20:22, 19 April 2016 (UTC)

Notice
Hi, Hasbino. I'm just posting to let you know that List of accolades received by Inside Out (2015 film) – a list that you have been heavily involved with – has been submitted as a candidate to be featured on the Main Page as Today's featured list. The proposed content can be seen here. You are more than welcome to post your thoughts on the nomination. Regards, Chompy Ace 15:04, 14 January 2023 (UTC)